Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel asks America to strike western Iraq first, if it decides to fight Saddam
Ha'aretz Daily ^ | Friday, February 08, 2002 Israel Time: 06:01 | By Amir Oren

Posted on 02/07/2002 7:49:22 PM PST by Bronco Buster

Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer paid a visit to the secretive Ness Ziona Biological Institute yesterday.

The Home Front commander, Maj. Gen. Yosef Mishlav, said recently that the plan to transfer the Home Front to the Ministry for Public Security has been frozen, so defending the population from nuclear, chemical, and biological warfare is still in the hands of the defense minister.

Ben-Eliezer was accompanied to the institute by an unusually small entourage, to keep a low profile. Presumably, the concern about a possible attack by Iraq, with unconventional payloads delivered by either missiles or planes, was one of the main subjects in the briefing given the minister by his hosts.

According to security sources participating in Israeli preparations for a possible American move on Iraq, any decision by President George W. Bush about when to attack Iraq depends on three main elements: building the case against Saddam, including charges and evidence; identifying an alternative ruler to replace Saddam; and building up the forces that will execute the planned attack.

The defense establishment here believes that the Bush administration has given up trying to find an Iraqi version of Afghanistan's Northern Alliance, so Washington is busy studying intelligence profiles of top Iraqi army commanders who could take control in Baghdad concurrent with or immediately after the start of an American campaign. In a U.S. attack, Saddam won't hurry to attack Israel, say defense sources, because, among other reasons, he won't want to expose the weaponry that he managed to hide - and deny he had - over the past decade.

The sources note that unlike the spring of 1990, when Saddam was already threatening to "burn half of Israel" (before he invaded Kuwait) if attacked, no such threats toward Israel have been coming out of Baghdad.

However, should Saddam conclude that the Americans are about to topple him, he'll try to attack Israel with a barrage of missiles or airplanes. Topping Israel's worries are a possible ground-to-ground missile attack, with chemical or biological payloads.

The defense establishment reckons that much lower on the list of possibilities would be Iraq sending pilots on suicide missions, whether to drop non-conventional payloads, or to crash their planes. The loyalty of Iraqi pilots to Saddam, and their readiness to die for him, while his regime is crumbling, is not at all the same as that of Japanese kamikaze pilots, who were ready to die for their emperor at the end of World War II.

In contacts between Israeli and American defense officials over the past few weeks, the Pentagon's representatives were asked to plan their operations in Iraq in such a way as to minimize the Iraqi ability to move missile launchers into western Iraq, from which missiles can reach Israel.

The Americans were told that Israel expects them to conduct operations, including on the ground, in western Iraq from the start of a campaign, and not to wait until Iraq starts launching missile attacks on Israel, as happened in 1991. Israeli officials say they believe the Pentagon will accede to this request.

The Pentagon meanwhile is very interested in technologies, weapons systems, and military doctrines developed in Israel over the past few years. In meetings in Washington with top defense officials and representatives of the Israeli defense establishment, led by Defense Ministry Director-General Amos Yaron, and including the head of weapons development and technology infrastructure Maj. Gen. Dr. Yitzhak Ben-Israel, videos were shown demonstrating examples of Israel's policy of "pinpoint targeting" in the territories. The emphasis was on combat helicopter attacks that caused no collateral damage to anything other than the target, even if many civilians were in the area.

American officers, from both the air force and special operations, visited Israel to learn about "pinpoint targeting" from IDF special operations commanders in the territories. Among other things, the Americans wanted to know about long-distance assassinations, along the lines of the operation - to kill Saddam Hussein - that foreign reports said was being rehearsed at the time of the Tze'elim 2 accident. The Americans were offered Israeli assistance in many areas, including inoculations against anthrax.

Along with the focus on Iraq, the defense establishment is keeping a close eye on developments in Iran. According to the latest Military Intelligence estimate, an event at Tarbit Madras University in Tehran a week ago, may be significant. Attended by government officials, including an adviser to Iranian President Muhamed Hatami, parliamentarians, and academic experts, the event was devoted to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Most of the speakers opposed the conservative policy of the Iranian spiritual leader Ali Hamani and demanded moderation of the government line against Israel, a line that is more extreme than the Palestinians.

Military Intelligence's estimate appears to strengthen the position that Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy publicly stated last month when he said that there is hope for moderation in the Iranian regime.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: Jimmyclyde
Mmmmmmm.....I don't think you're rational enough to deal with the reality of the problems in the middle east.
81 posted on 02/08/2002 6:48:40 AM PST by american in america
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: american in america
Good response...full of substance. I'm still waiting for you to answer your own question? Share with me some of your rational, based in reality thoughts.
84 posted on 02/08/2002 7:04:26 AM PST by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
I think you got it wrong. I'm the one that asked the question. I was looking for an answer, not to answer my own question.
85 posted on 02/08/2002 7:14:53 AM PST by american in america
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Bronco Buster
Why would the U.S. or Israel telegraph their punches?
86 posted on 02/08/2002 7:16:32 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american in america
Oh man...brillant, just brillant. See my post #80.

Let me put it this way.

Could you please state your opinion on the Middle East? Since I am not based in reality and am not rational, I turn to you for answers.

87 posted on 02/08/2002 7:21:29 AM PST by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: The Documentary Lady
The New Cold War is the fault of......Drum roll please....

THE JEWS!!!!!

Your one note song grows tiresome.

88 posted on 02/08/2002 7:24:23 AM PST by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: wheezer
What was left undone was the complete destruction of the Iraqi military, in particular Colin Powell's persuading Bush I against the advice of Schwartzkopf to stop the air attacks on the retreating Iraqis and the failure to require the destruction of the Republican Guard.

Success in war is the result of recognizing, and taking advantage of, the opportunities that present themselves which cannot have been forseen. The collapse of Iraqi resistance and the disintegration of the Iraqi military was one of those opportunities.

To argue that because it wasn't specifically enumerated on some sort of to do list or job description (your words), taking advantage of the opportunity to destroy Iraqi military capablity completely, reflects an utter lack of strategic sense. It is Emerson's foolish consistency that is the hobgoblin of little minds, much beloved of small statesmen, philosophers and divines.

90 posted on 02/08/2002 8:04:22 AM PST by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: codeword
Got your tin foil hat on?

You are either with us or you are one of them. Which is it?

91 posted on 02/08/2002 8:23:05 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
..taking advantage of the opportunity to destroy Iraqi military capablity completely, reflects an utter lack of strategic sense.

IMHO, destroying Iraq's military to the point where it would have been overrun by Iran probably was a factor in the decisions made at the time, and to me made perfect and sober strategic sense.
92 posted on 02/08/2002 8:44:25 AM PST by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
OBL has been dead since before Dec 13th.

And how do you know this? Did you get this information via radio waves to your dental fillings?

93 posted on 02/08/2002 8:57:55 AM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You are either with us or you are one of them. Which is it?

Hitler made a comment like this. You remind me of him.

94 posted on 02/08/2002 8:59:59 AM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: codeword
You remind me of him

The young, vigorous, chick-magnet Hitler, or the old, fat, peanut butter and banana sandwich eating Hitler?

95 posted on 02/08/2002 9:19:40 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: codeword
///freerepublic/ignorelist"codeword"/close///
97 posted on 02/08/2002 9:53:47 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: Bruce Leroy
please explain to me where they are getting enriched uranium ... or weapons-grade plutonium ... since the Israelis destroyed their ability to make it ... do you have proof? ... show me one finished warhead taken out of Iraq ... or ever shown ... it's a complex process that took the Israelis years and $500 million per year (estimated by some) to finally achieve it ...

I rather doubt Iraq has fission nor fusion weapons ... period ... bring solid proof of EXISTING WEAPONS, not just components, like high-speed triggers, if you have it ... if not, don't bother me ...
99 posted on 02/08/2002 12:09:25 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: The Documentary Lady
You are so full of crap I can smell you from here.

I feel sorry for you if you really believe the trash you post.

Israel and Lebanon the same? BWAAAAHAAAAAAA!!!

First off the elections held in Lebanon are as honest and truthful as the ones held where assafat was elected President.

How many Christians have been murdered in Israel in the past month? ZERO!! The same can not be said about Lebanon thanks to the blood thristy Syrians that control the country.

Stop telling lies and realize that Israel is paradise compared with the Moslem nations around it.

100 posted on 02/08/2002 12:58:59 PM PST by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson