Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AUgrad
Regardless of what the different denominations claim, there is only ONE correct interpretation of scripture - the one the writer intended.
687 posted on 02/08/2002 10:48:52 AM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies ]


To: exmarine
Again you fail to address my question. Who knows what the writer intended?
691 posted on 02/08/2002 10:51:52 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies ]

To: exmarine
Regardless of what the different denominations claim, there is only ONE correct interpretation of scripture - the one the writer intended.

I disagree. If a writer writes badly, a reasonable interpretation of his work might be completely at odds with what he intended.

Once a writer puts his work down on paper, anyone who reads it is free to interpret it, and the writer's interpretation becomes just one among many. He may claim he meant to say something, but he may have failed in his attempt, and thus his intention is not reflected in his actual words. And it is his words that get interpreted, not his subjective intent.
696 posted on 02/08/2002 10:56:17 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson