That's evident. Why not, however?
Afraid to look at the unconstitutional nature of much federal law or reluctant to deal with the ethical and existential consequences of truckling to the powerful?
Afraid to look at the unconstitutional nature of much federal law or reluctant to deal with the ethical and existential consequences of truckling to the powerful?
I have already clearly outlined my explanation to you. The differences between the USSR and the USA, are like night and day. The fact you don't like what I had to say, doesn't mean I'm being weak, or submissive in any way, shape or form and is argumentative. As I told someone else on this thread, I'm not an absolutist and I don't agree with such a set of values and beliefs. I'm a conservative who believes in the Constitution and supports traditional American values. Limiting the size and scope of the federal government is one of those traditional values. For the last seventy years thn federal government has traveled down a road that has created social programs and promoted liberal ideas that are not consistent with a smaller and limited government. Reversing those trends should be a #1 priority for all republicans and all conservatives. But turning back seven decades years of FDR-LBJ-Clinton lead expansions of the federal governemnt will not happen overnight.