Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity Post on Vanity Posts, Duplicate Posts, Trash Posts, Commie Propaganda, etc., Vol V, No. 1
Free Republic ^ | 1/25/02 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/31/2002 8:32:21 AM PST by Admin Moderator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last
To: coteblanche
And don't you forget it! ;-)

I'll file that under lesson # 843: don't disagree - if you're on foot - with a snowmobiler who can ride and shoot at the same time!

;>)

161 posted on 02/01/2002 9:34:44 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
If you are being attacked for this, let us know.

I pointed out the rules as you said was the thing to do at the 'Talk-Fest Torture: All Keyed Up, Nowhere to Go' thread. I have been abused, and you and I have been mocked for your lack of response, details in my recent email. Please tell me what else I should do.

162 posted on 02/01/2002 12:23:42 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"How are the hard core Moderates to be addressed, those who have Republican status yet consistently vote against us?"

One can be a conservative republican and still retain the ability to discern and discriminate between right and wrong regardless of Party affiliation. Why is this not a good thing for FR? I thought total agreement and adherence to a Party led to extremism. For example, people did'nt pay too much attention to religious fanatics before the World Trade Center attack because we consider them as nutz for taking their religion to the extremes where it turns into My Way or The Highway. How is this different from total allegience to a Party? How can you ascertain criminal behavior objectively? Isn't this what we condemned the Democrats for - blindly following Bozo without thought for what is right or wrong? Many now agree Bozo was a mesmerizer getting alot of people to behave/act wrongmindedly. Wouldn't this be true for anyone? I guess what I'm trying to say is good men can become bad when enough pressure from those who pull the strings are exerted. President Bush may be the best president we could have, but can we say the same about those top 300 who comprise the Bilderbergers? Trilateral Commission? CFR? Aren't they the ones who Run the Show, according to many freepers, or do the present minds here think that this ruling triumvirate is okay as long as President Bush acts as G_d's Watchman over America?

I remember all the 4-word posts during Bozo's reign: ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY. Who's exempt from this maxim?

No flames, please. I'm merely trying to get FR to comment on my thoughts, which might be misguided.

163 posted on 02/01/2002 1:51:32 PM PST by JusticeLives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"tough, I'll post what I think needs to be seen."

That guy need shock therapy for an attitude adjustment, IMO.

164 posted on 02/01/2002 3:22:07 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961,admin moderator
The price of FReedom, is eternal vigilance. We report-- you be the judge.


165 posted on 02/04/2002 8:03:15 PM PST by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson