[Khepera]

We will all be better off to encourage our government to enforce sodomy laws already on the books. That would force the sodomites back into the closet and away from the children without hampering their "Private" activities. The problem is when they are allowed protection from prosecution they become vocal advocates for indoctrination into their lifestyle. By gaining government approval it is hard for parents to convince their children that unchecked promiscuity and sexual perversion are wrong. They just say "hey its not against the law so what can it hurt when it feels so good?"

[ThinkDifferent]

They just say "hey its not against the law so what can it hurt when it feels so good?"

We've been down this road before. Do you honestly want the government criminalizing all private behavior that you don't like? If you're opposed to sex acts in public, as I am, then support laws against sex acts in public. Don't support overbroad laws regulating people's private lives that can be selectively enforced. After all, heterosexuals have been known to practice sodomy too.

[EODGUY]

Good point, K-man. I find it interesting that the left advocates selective law enforcement. Violation of laws enacted to prohibit Pro-Life advocates from praying too close to an abortion mill should, in their opinion, be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Sodomy laws, on the other hand, should be stricken from the books.

Let me think, which of the activities noted above pose the greatest threat to the physical, emotional and spiritual well-being of members of our society?

God Bless,

EODGUY