Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WindRiverShoshoni
Re your post #71 -- Seriously, the cases aren't parallel, and she'd have her picture taken

OK, I apologize as I found your reply above. But how you can say, with a straight face, that the cases "aren't" parallel? Of course they are. Exactly the same. The state, for law enforcement purposes, is again requiring a photo. Sounds EXACTLY the same to me.

I am sorry but I disagree with you on your two main points here:

(1) It is way too big a burden to ask someone to provide a photo to comply with the law (NO, it is NOT a "substantial" burden); and

(2) Now, you are going to play 'pick and choose' when she has to give a photo and when she does not -- are you willing to defend MY right to ALSO 'pick and choose' when I feel like giving a photo?

Because if you are as willing to fight for MY desire for PRIVACY as HER desire for PRIVACY then maybe we could be on the same page -- but, I have a feeling you desire to defend ends with her. I am excluded. I am discriminated against. Right? I am not trying to be funny here. It is infuriating to me that I have NO privacy or choice in these matters -- but SHE and ONLY she should. NOT FAIR.
211 posted on 01/30/2002 5:45:26 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: summer
you desire = your desire
213 posted on 01/30/2002 5:47:25 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson