Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Dodged Extinction
ABCNews ^ | Lee Dye

Posted on 01/29/2002 7:23:19 PM PST by Sabertooth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: Sabertooth
We almost dodged extinction in that story too.

Good one!

41 posted on 01/29/2002 7:54:38 PM PST by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doom
Plenty of evidence of speciation. Most species are species because they never interact, not because they can't. Sheeesh. Anyone who says speciation does not occur is being intellectually dishonest. However, the types of mutations and changes needed to move from one taxa to another is something we have not seen at all. I cannot think of a single case of a modern switch even at the genus level.
42 posted on 01/29/2002 7:55:46 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The dinosaurs died off by smoking!! The Gov is saving us by the billion dollar lawsuits (sarcasm) Whether evolution or Creation, the hand of God was on the human race form the beginning. Atheism is indefensible. When will science become unshackled from Naturalistic Presuppositions!?
43 posted on 01/29/2002 7:56:34 PM PST by trevorjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Observed Instances of Speciation
44 posted on 01/29/2002 7:56:40 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
A grand statement totally unsupported by any evidence whatsoever!
45 posted on 01/29/2002 7:56:56 PM PST by Rushian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rushian
Which statement are you referring to?
46 posted on 01/29/2002 7:58:19 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
see, the issue I have with harmonizing modern science with Biblical narrative is the anachronism. If you say that the true meaning of Genesis only makes sense according to modern science, what you're really saying is that Jesus, his Disciples, the prophets, Moses, etc. did not really understand Genesis 1. I don't know if I want to say that.
47 posted on 01/29/2002 7:58:22 PM PST by modern_orthodox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John H K
"Most likely candidate I've seen for the cause of the almost-extinction was the eruption of the Supervolcano Toba in Indonesia 70,000 years ago...the last Supervolcano to have erupted."

Yup. I think you are correct. However, there have been a number of 'thinning out' periods. There have been five worldwide catastrophies in the last 10k years alone, some refer to these as 'near extinction' events. The last one occurred in 540AD. Toba was the 'butt kicker' though.

48 posted on 01/29/2002 8:00:25 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
“The amount of genetic variation that has accumulated in humans is just nowhere near compatible with the age” of the species, Wood says. “That means you’ve got to come up with a hypothesis for an event that wiped out the vast majority of that variation.”

Hmmm...
Like a really big flood, maybe?

49 posted on 01/29/2002 8:00:49 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
oh please. More junk science....
50 posted on 01/29/2002 8:04:05 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Did the volcanic eruption only wipe out humans and not the chimps?
51 posted on 01/29/2002 8:04:11 PM PST by Rushian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: John H K
but this Supervolcano did not have such an impact with chimps?
52 posted on 01/29/2002 8:05:43 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rushian
same question, almost same time
53 posted on 01/29/2002 8:06:19 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
but the eruption didn't effect chimps? That sounds like bad science.
54 posted on 01/29/2002 8:08:24 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Salman
The slight problem being that there isn't ANY evidence, anywhere, for a global flood event occuring after the appearance of the first humans. (My definition of "evidence" being that that a trained geologist would use, not a young-earth-creationist kookjob that wouldn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.)

There is also no possible geological or meteorological mechanism for such an event.

There is some evidence, probably overhyped by the media, that a sudden flooding of the shores of the Black Sea from the Mediterranean may have been the source of the various Babylonian and Assyrian flood myths that eventually later made into the Bible as the Noah story, but this would still be a very localized event and couldn't possibly account for the human biodiversity bottleneck. Also, it's much too recent to be the bottleneck, anyway.

55 posted on 01/29/2002 8:08:26 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Humanoids are believed to have split off from chimpanzees about 5 million to 6 million years ago.


56 posted on 01/29/2002 8:09:17 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: modern_orthodox
...the issue I have with harmonizing modern science with Biblical narrative is the anachronism. If you say that the true meaning of Genesis only makes sense according to modern science, what you're really saying is that Jesus, his Disciples, the prophets, Moses, etc. did not really understand Genesis 1.

But that's not what I'm saying.

Let's set Jesus aside, and let's talk about the non-divine... did the Prophets or Disciples understand every aspect of Genesis, including what happened in the gaps that even a literal interpretation of thousands of years would have to concede?

And getting back to Jesus, did He tell all he knew about all things?


57 posted on 01/29/2002 8:09:29 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Here is an excerpt from a reputable scientist concerning catastrophic plate tectonics:

John Baumgardner (B.S, M.S., Ph.D (UCLA)) is a geophysicist employed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. His work involves detailed computer modeling of the structure and processes of the earth's interior, as well as a variety of other fluid dynamics phenomena. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: DR Baumgardner, some say that because of continental drift (the idea that the continents have broken apart and moved thousands of miles) one has to believe in 'millions of years'.

JB: Well, I believe there is now overwhelming evidence in favour of continental break-up and large-scale plate tectonic activity. The acceptance of these concepts is an amazing example of a scientific revolution, which occurred roughly between 1960 and 1970. However, this revolution did not go far enough, because the earth science community neglected and suppressed the evidences for catastrophism — large-scale, rapid change — throughout the geological record. So the timescale the uniformitarian scientists today are using is dramatically too long. The strong weight of evidence is that there was a massive catastrophe, corresponding to the Genesis Flood, which involved large and rapid continental movements. My conclusion is that the only mechanism capable of producing that scale of catastrophe and not wrecking the planet in the process had to be internal to the earth.

I am persuaded it involved rapid subduction (sinking) of the pre-Flood ocean floor, pulling the 'plates' apart at the beginning of the Flood, and was probably associated with the breaking up of the 'fountains of the great deep' described in Scripture.

A 1993 New Scientist article spoke highly of your 3-D supercomputer model of plate tectonics.

JB: There are to my knowledge three other computer codes for modeling the earth's mantle and so on, in the world. These other three use a mathematical method not so well suited for the modern parallel supercomputers. The one I developed uses the finite element technique and performs very well on the new, very large supercomputers. So, many of my colleagues are recognizing it as the most capable code in the world.

Last year NASA funded this effort as one of the nine grand challenge projects for the next three years in their High Performance Computing and Communication initiative, and are supporting two post-doctoral researchers to collaborate with me to improve it, and apply it to study the earth.

This code is comparable to what are called general circulation models for the atmosphere and oceans, which are some of the largest codes in the world in terms of how much machine power they consume. It's got lots of physics in it to model the details of the mechanical behaviour of the silicate rock inside the earth. My present focus is to make the representation of the tectonic plates even more realistic. So the code is in an ongoing state of development, but it's come a long way in the last 15 years.

We understand you've shown that as these floating blocks of rock push down into the material below, things get hotter, so the 'slipperyness' increases and there's a runaway effect. The faster they sink the hotter they get, so the faster they can sink.

JB: Yes — rock that represents the ocean floor is colder, and therefore denser than the rock below it and so can sink into the earth's interior. And the properties of the rock inside the earth, especially at the high temperatures that exist there, make it possible for the colder rock from the earth's surface to peel away and sink in a runaway manner down through the mantle — very rapidly.

So this 'happens' on your computer model all by itself, from the laws of science — over a short time-scale, not millions of years?

JB: That's correct. Exactly how long is something I'm working to refine. But it seems that once this sinking of the pre-Flood ocean floor (in a conveyor-belt-like fashion down into the earth, pulling things apart behind it) starts, it is not a slow process spanning millions of years — it's almost certain that it runs to completion and 'recycles' all of the existing floor in a few weeks or months.

You're part of a team of top creation scientists3 which is developing a model of catastrophic plate tectonics based on this mechanism, which believes the continents broke up (from a single landmass) during, not after the Flood as some have proposed.

JB: Yes. There is compelling evidence from the fossil-bearing sediments on the continents that the breakup occurred during the time these sediments were being deposited. We are convinced that this 'continental sprint' as it's been called, was during the time of the Flood, and part of the mechanism for it.

58 posted on 01/29/2002 8:09:44 PM PST by adakotab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Ah-ha! Noah did have three sons who would all share a lot of genetic traits, BUT each of these had a genetically different wife. Already there is clearly more genetic diversity, than a single pair of chimps.
59 posted on 01/29/2002 8:10:03 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
ROTFLMAO
60 posted on 01/29/2002 8:11:55 PM PST by Rushian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson