Boy, it sure took you some time to clean off the keyboard, didn't it, "ReaganMan"?
You know that your argument is much ado about nothing. You know that I'm a conservative. You know that your argument that I'm a DU disruptor has just fallen apart. So now that I've opened up a serious can of whoopass on you, you answer back with THIS pathetic exuse for a response.......
Now I'm effing pissed.
Be pissed all you want. If you support President Bush and can still insult him with the term Shrub, you have a serious problem.
Oh I have a problem? Here I am with two years of solid conservative postings on this board. Here I am with a solid record of pro-2nd Amendment, pro-life, pro-free market (not as doctrinaire on pro-life, to my recollection, but I do consider myself pro-life), and very nationalistic postings and all you can come up with is this?
Where is the proof that I'm in DemocraticUnderground.Com? Hmmmm? Oh, you must not have any!
Isn't that nice.
But that didn't stop you from making the charge, did it, you stooge.
I would ask you for an apology for such an insult...
Now to the meat of the matter, where our friend, Reagan Man, shows that yes, he is no Ronald Reagan.
You talk about character. LMAO! To call the President, Shrub, shows you have a problem not only with the truth, but with humility too. Stop crying and whining on FR. This is the place for conservatives to hold intelligent debates and isn't the place for so-called conservatives, like you, to trash the Mr.Bush!
Grow up already, you whiner!
Oh this is most rich! Now you, a "so called conservative" are now going to try to regulate what I can write? Hmmmm? I don't recall anyone giving you that authority. Methinks that you might subscribe to the doctring of political correctness and speech codes.
You know, now that I think of it, they rather like political correctness and speech codes over at DemocraticUnderground.Com. And here you are calling for me to revise what I write to please you and questioning my conservativism because I refuse to comply with your silly demands.
It's rather curious how they like to do that over at DU. It's also kind of curious that you want to do that here. One might be tempted to presume that you're a disruptor, but since you've been here for two years, I won't do such a thing. Because I think before I write. Meanwhile...
Now that I called you on your mendacity, and showed you up to be the empty vessel that you are, you accuse me of whining. You say that this is a place for intelligent debate, and you're right. But this is not the place for speech codes and gatekeepers.
People such as yourself.
Now that I've whipped you around like a cur, let's see if you can come up with a more intelligent response to the problem of Jeb Bush's daughter than the ignorant drivel you have posted up to now. Because you simply can't argue with me if you go down the path you are going. There comes a point when further argument with a blind man becomes pointless, even though you might be a cyclops.
Be Seeing You,
Chris