Depends on what you expect. If you expect us to be a bunch of art-prudes who blush every time we see a Rubens painting, then I am happy we disappointed you. If you expect us to be against the waste of 8000 dollars of federal money, applied in such a way as to cause the applier to be the butt of jokes from now until either 2004 or 2008, well, then, yes, that is what you can expect.
I appreciate your clarity on this topic, and I quite agree this cover-up could have easily been nipped in the bud before it became such a big bust for the AG. And of course the ninnies would say tongue in cheek that they are only trying to help.
I have worries protesters will use this issue as a foundation for dissent by covering up publicly owned art and standing next to their work with signs correlating what they are doing with this action by the AG.
I have fears he left himself wide open by putting this art under cover.