[Lazamataz]

He did not desecrate anything! Just covered the dang thing up during photo ops where jerks were purposely shooting boob angles with him as the butt of the joke.

Covering art up is not the best response. Also, it was politically tone-deaf in the extreme. His best response would have been to make a backdrop for his podium, 'to help the photographers get their lighting correct'. Restrict where photographers may stand. Then the angle could never have been made, and he would not now be the butt of jokes for the next 3 to 7 years.

Funny, this boob shoot has never been done before. Does that tell you anything!

I would never tell you that the news media is made up of anything but die-hard liberals.

[Cold Heat]

It is possible that restricting angles was found to be unworkable. Bacically, all he did was re-arrange the backdrop on a temporary basis. I am no prude, nor a bible thumper but I understand the distraction now that photos were published.

My anger about this is due to the fact that I thought I had accidently gone to DU when I saw the comments on this thread. I find that to be worrysome and somewhat surprising.