[1L]

LOL...I gave you five links(that required minimal digging) and you quote the least of the offenses as the most grave, then you return to the everyone involved has to be a conspirator nonsense.

No, you gave me three links that talked about the same damn thing. And what I returned to is reasoned argument that you can't seem to deal with, so you call it nonsense. Do you really think that if the investigators found any evidence of murder they would keep quiet when an unknown medical examiner calls the murder a suicide?

Please tell me, and all of us here that you are a dimocrat posing as a Conservative, because you are straining the limits of even remote believability.

This is just stupid. It is not me, but YOU that is straining believability. You see, it is YOU that has the burden to prove this was anything but a suicide. As far as being a democrat, that's equally as stupid. I've never voted anything but Republican and I am just about the most conservative person on this forum. Before making totally stupid statements, research my posts.

For now I will adjudge, based on the assininity you have provided, that 1L, stands for 1Liberal.

Oh, so I won't buy into your assinine conspiratorial theories, so I'm a liberal? Again, this is just stupid.

Please, unless you have something intelligent to post, don't. You are truly making yourself look like a real idiot. If you want to keep it up, be my guest, but unless you can produce ANY, even a shred, of evidence to show this even MAY have been a murder, this is my last post.

[sweetliberty]

You know, I have read this thread twice and I would like to offer an observation. When I was interning in family counseling my mentor alerted me to a valuable tool for assessing a conflict. He said "whoever is yelling the loudest is most often the one most in the wrong." I would take that a step furthur and say that the one who first resorts to name calling and demeaning attacks is likely the one most in the wrong. Of course, he was referring to marriage specifically, but I have found that the principle generalizes to many other situations as well.

That said, I am familiar with PBWY's posts and he makes the more reasonable and informed argument in my opinion. You would likely be taken more seriously if you refrained from calling people foolish and unintelligent. It is remarks like these which, when having no basis in fact, give people the idea that you may have liberal leanings because that tends to be their MO. If you believe that he is mistaken in some of his arguments, or if you question his resources, then point out where he or they are in error and substantiate your arguments. Otherwise I would suggest that you refrain from engaging in a battle of wits when it is evident that you are unarmed.