Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JMJ333
I'm not in favor of of removing the stigmatism from two men performing anal sex with one another.

There was a time when a majority of people didn't want to remove the stigmatism of interracial marriage. Many would probably still like to see it outlawed. That doesn't make it right.

You're trying to de-humanize homosexuals by focusing on one sex act, mitigating the fact that many can and do live in committed and loving relationships.

I'm sure you don't define your marriage by what sex acts you and your wife perform.

45 posted on 01/24/2002 6:03:15 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
There was a time when a majority of people didn't want to remove the stigmatism of interracial marriage. Many would probably still like to see it outlawed. That doesn't make it right.

You're comparing a heterosexual married relationship between people of mixed races, to homosexual behavior? The two aren't even close to being comparable.

You're trying to de-humanize homosexuals by focusing on one sex act, mitigating the fact that many can and do live in committed and loving relationships.

It is not me who seeks to define myself by my sexual behavior. The homosexual community insists that we shall accept their lifestyle, now matter how "de-humanizing" it is. They degrade themselves and insist that I close my eyes and pretend it isn;t what it is.

I'm sure you don't define your marriage by what sex acts you and your wife perform.

I'm a woman. Sex act??? What happened to love?

49 posted on 01/24/2002 6:20:50 AM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson