Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
?????

There are some problems with radiocarbon dating. The system assumes the percentage of radioactive carbon isotopes in the atmosphere is constant and this has recently been proved to be incorrect. Volcanic eruptions effect radiocarbon dating.

However, the basic PREMISE of the system is correct. We only need to make certain corrections to account for these discrepancies.

There are other problems which appeared in a recent study of the "Shroud of Turin". Apparently some material of organic origins like cloths and tapestries can acquire, over a long time frame, a heavy coating of bioplastic produced by organisms living on the original organic substrate, which can then skew the results to indicate a more recent dating. The solution is to remove the bioplastic before initiating the radiocarbon testing.

The studies I have read indicate ALL early hominid fossils demonstrate a very SHORT life span as well as numerous bone fractures and other kinds of skeletal damage which indicated a very dangerous, rough type of life. I never saw anything to indicate any early hominids lived for "hundreds" of years.

33 posted on 01/22/2002 5:19:11 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ZULU
There is a non-fiction book ("Buried Alive") written by a dentist who has performed several tests on Neanderthal skulls and jaws. I cannot remember the author's name, but was pretty convincing. Using several pieces of equipment, he came to the conclusion that the skulls of Neanderthals could not be produced in only 40 years (the common accepted lifespan of Neanderthals).
37 posted on 01/22/2002 5:46:51 AM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson