Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClancyJ
Substitute "joint physical custody" for "support" and then make the same argument!!!
44 posted on 01/20/2002 2:51:38 PM PST by DNA Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: DNA Rules
I stick by my comments. Those children have not been divorced and are to still have a father. It is just an excuse to not pay because of what the ex does with the money. All money goes in a pot and the daily costs for the children come out of the pot.

Fathers that chose to quit supporting their children because they don't like what a woman does with the money are still throwing their children to the wind. The children know and will always remember that their father did not care enough for them to see that funds were provided for their care. A horrible thing for children to learn and this is totally in the hands of the father to control.

I also know from experience since I never got funds for my child. My ex even laughed about the ruses that could be used to avoid paying support.

63 posted on 01/20/2002 5:59:28 PM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson