I attack any stupid decision by our government. You're busy cheering those decisions because you are bent on interpreting anything negative toward support of Israel or things they do as shilling for the PA.
You said you stood for the truth. The truth is that we are being robbed blind and have no choice where the money goes claims that our vote makes a different notwithstanding.
You refuse to distinguish valid criticisms from invalid ones. Planting booby traps where children play is wrong no matter what the motivation. And I'll tell you something else that is wrong even though I might have felt that it was right at the time. The man that shot up that Batmitzvah was executed on the spot by Israeli police.
I don't agree with that either. He wasn't just shot in a gun battle with police. He had been subdued by the crowd. The police dragged him out of the building and shot him 4 times in the head. That is swift justice for sure. But it goes against everything that the U.S. has long stood for. Namely due process. Perhaps not anymore. At any rate. It is not anti-Semitic to call that wrong. And it isn't shilling for Palestinians to say that American taxpayer money should only fund the legitimate functions of OUR government and not our allies or terrorist dictators abroad.
I guess Bush is stupid and the American Congress as well. You're smarter than them of course.
You said you stood for the truth. The truth is that we are being robbed blind and have no choice where the money goes claims that our vote makes a different notwithstanding.
Run for office then. In the meantime other people pay taxes who do approve of the support.
You refuse to distinguish valid criticisms from invalid ones. Planting booby traps where children play is wrong no matter what the motivation. And I'll tell you something else that is wrong even though I might have felt that it was right at the time. The man that shot up that Batmitzvah was executed on the spot by Israeli police.
Figures. Takes some incidents of error and make a policy of them and then yap about moral equivalency. That kind of lame-brained argument is fit for the dogs.
I don't agree with that either. He wasn't just shot in a gun battle with police. He had been subdued by the crowd. The police dragged him out of the building and shot him 4 times in the head. That is swift justice for sure. But it goes against everything that the U.S. has long stood for. Namely due process. Perhaps not anymore. At any rate. It is not anti-Semitic to call that wrong. And it isn't shilling for Palestinians to say that American taxpayer money should only fund the legitimate functions of OUR government and not our allies or terrorist dictators abroad.
LOL! Let somebody come into your wedding or service and shoot your mom, or dad, or grandfather and guests and then come back to me about "due process". The guy was packing grenades a gun and possibly a body bomb. It's a basic and fundamental principle of law - self-defence and the fact you don't have to weigh with a nicety the force you use to defend yourself - especially when men, women and children are being shot around you. Give it up. The more you talk the weaker you sound.
I believe what you are failing to distinguish is the differentiation between a police action and war against terrorism. When a man strides into a gathering of innocents who are celebrating in a festive tradition and begins cutting them down one by one... then that is war...and war is hell. Death to the intruder is the only reasonable and acceptable conclusion.