Ok, so let's have your complete repudiation of what this character has stated. Moreover, you still have not ansered my question concerning his sleight of hand pseudo-history. Better left marginalized or maybe forgotten? Too embarrasing?
Not even scholars of the Torah and Talmud won't completely repudiate what he has said. Give it a rest already. What you're saying in reality is that if I don't agree with you I must agree with him. That nonsense logic is for you to practice and enjoy all by yourself.