Posted on 01/18/2002 12:28:27 AM PST by sarcasm
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
When you do a piece based on a photo, you follow it to the letter.
You capture a second in time. The warts and all.
The Iwo Jima monument is a case in point. It followed Rosenthals photo as best as the sculpter could do.
He did not take any artistic license with him when he went into the studio. He depicted the photo as best as he could.
The truth is always more fascinating than fiction.
b. January 12, 1923 Sacaton, Arizona
d. January 24, 1955 Bapchule, Arizona
Ira Hayes was a Pima Indian. When he enlisted in the Marine Corps, he had hardly ever been off the Reservation. His Chief told him to be an "Honorable Warrior" and bring honor upon his family. Ira was a dedicated Marine. Quiet and steady, he was admired by his fellow Marines who fought alongside him in three Pacific battles.
When Ira learned that President Roosevelt wanted him and the other survivors to come back to the US to raise money on the 7th Bond Tour, he was horrified. To Ira, the heroes of Iwo Jima, those deserving honor, were his "good buddies" who died there.
At the White House, President Truman told Ira, "You are an American hero." But Ira didn't feel pride. As he later lamented, "How could I feel like a hero when only five men in my platoon of 45 survived, when only 27 men in my company of 250 managed to escape death or injury?"
The Bond Tour was an ordeal for Ira. He couldn't understand or accept the adulation . . . "It was supposed to be soft duty, but I couldn't take it. Everywhere we went people shoved drinks in our hands and said 'You're a Hero!' We knew we hadn't done that much but you couldn't tell them that."
Ira Hayes in later years . . .
Ira went back to the reservation attempting to lead an anonymous life. But it didn't turn out that way . . . "I kept getting hundreds of letters. And people would drive through the reservation, walk up to me and ask, 'Are you the Indian who raised the flag on Iwo Jima"
Ira tried to drown his "Conflict of Honor" with alcohol. Arrested as drunk and disorderly, his pain was clear . . . "I was sick. I guess I was about to crack up thinking about all my good buddies. They were better men than me and they're not coming back. Much less back to the White House, like me."
In 1954, Ira reluctantly attended the dedication of the Iwo Jima monument in Washington. After a ceremony where he was lauded by President Eisenhower as a hero once again, a reporter rushed up to Ira and asked him, "How do you like the pomp & circumstances?" Ira just hung his head and said, I don't."
Ira died three months later after a night of drinking. As Ira drank his last bottle of whiskey he was crying and mumbling about his "good buddies." Ira was 32.
I think tis is very insulting to those firemen of Asian extraction. That Clarence would support such an exclusionary memorial suggests to me that he is a racist. < /sarcasm >
How do you suppose Mr. Page would be reacting if the original photo had been of three black men raising the flag and the statue was changed to include a white and Hispanic man? The wailing on discrimination and racism would be heard up one side of Manhattan and down the other.
In fact, many artists will tell you that their job is to represent, not to duplicate.
Let's inspect what propaganda was being represented in the art.
Art has long been used as a powerful tool of propaganda. IMO, the race issue/problem clouds the heart of the issue/problem. It just goes to prove that anybody can appreciate fine art. Yes, a photo that captures the expression and moment is art. Bad art is not captivating.
I read in one of the articles that the design for the statue included changes other than ethnic. A lot is missing from the character of the firefighter on the left -- the right-hand position is, IMO, a classic working-man posture. And the firefighter on the left leaning forward with arm straining upward changes his character.
Setting aside the ethnic issue, IMO, the clay statue has a "salute to the flag/government" feel to it. Whereas the photo has a "salute to the heroes/patriots/country" feel to it. I find the difference most prominent in the firefighter on the left. Moderately in the firefighter on the right. And moderately in the firefighter at center because his head is looking upward where the flag is not supposed to be. The flag being so high above the firefighters, IMO, adds to the "salute the flag/government".
I'm really curious to know who else sensed a similar loss of aesthetic appeal from the non-ethnic changes in the three characters? 18
The workers/heroes/patriots of America created the country -- not the flag/government. The tremendous values that the workers/heroes/patriots in the WTC twin towers pumped into society every few days was more than they themselves would consume in their lifetimes. And the majestic, aesthetic appeal of the twin towers eclipsing the New York City skyline is fitting with the workers/heroes/patriots that make this country the greatest in the world. Their presence was undeniable.
It is the workers/heroes/patriots that created the flag/government and their creation cannot be legitimately placed in higher value than its creators. I think the people that designed and sculpted the clay statue tried to usurp the highest value. 23
I don't think it was pay back. Rather, like Hillary, Ratner is trying to usurp the highest value that makes this the greatest country in the world. See post #23 24
Good choice of before and after words--strong natural character wimpified. The statue character seems much smaller in importance than in the fireman in photo. 33
It's not lost on me. I see it. Similar to Hillary being booed off the stage. She tried to usurp greatness. She didn't earn a right to be on the stage and probably not even in the audience. Paul McCartney earned his way into greatness as did the firefighters and police officers. For that matter, the workers/heroes/patriots that make this the greatest country in the world are of greater value than the government/politicians they allow to meddle in the affairs of their great country. 38
It reminds me of Soviet art from the Stalin era. Also notice how the fireman on the left has had his clothes altered.
As a work of "art" the whole thing is altered subtly in nearly a dozen places so that the overall reflection is grossly altered. Once we set the ethnic issue aside we get to the heart of the issue.
That sculpture gives me the creeps.
It really does. Has a lot to do with reflecting on the art in the photo that is very pro-worker/hero/patriot. ...That can't be missed. Great art has that affect/effect.
Juxtaposition to the statue that in the name of "art" is anti-worker/hero/patriot...pro-state/government. That's an inversion of values intended to usurp and oppress. 53
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.