[the_doc]

I respectfully recommend that you forget about whether this thing is preteristic or that thing is preteristic--and focus on what the 1000 years in Revelation 20 really is. That means that we need to figure out what the "first resurrection" in Revelation 20 really is.

(And I would not trust an RC priest to present it, RnMom.)

After I became convinced concerning the first resurrection, a lot of other things fell into place for me. I am now a partial preterist.

[don-o]

After I became convinced concerning the first resurrection, a lot of other things fell into place for me. I am now a partial preterist.

I kmow exactly what you mean. But, when I became convinced concerning the second resurrection, a lot of other things fell into place for me. I am now a Moonie.

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

After I became convinced concerning the first resurrection, a lot of other things fell into place for me. I am now a partial preterist.

So far, it is salvation and those who actually raised with Christ after His first resurrection.(Matt 27)
I believe it is the one spoken by Christ Himself to Martha when He raised Lazarus "...though he die, yet shall he live!"