To: ArneFufkin
you are correct, please read #34.
I think that Wendy Gramm should be sued by the federal government and her family's assets should be depleted in that process regardless of whether it is just or not. Ten years ago president Bush did that to 20,000 Americans even though their only crime was similarly sitting on the Board of Directors of an S&L that went bankrupt.
I remember those days and I remember that Phil Gramm did not speak out about that injustice 10 years ago. Wendy Gramm being the wife of a prominent Texas Republican may be protected. It's not fair.
To: Red Jones
I think that Wendy Gramm should be sued by the federal government and her family's assets should be depleted in that process regardless of whether it is just or not. Ten years ago president Bush did that to 20,000 Americans even though their only crime was similarly sitting on the Board of Directors of an S&L that went bankrupt.
I remember those days and I remember that Phil Gramm did not speak out about that injustice 10 years ago. Wendy Gramm being the wife of a prominent Texas Republican may be protected. It's not fair.
Life is not fair. Just because there was some injustice ten years ago does not mean that the same injustices have to be repeated today. Bush was wrong to do what he did ten years ago, but just because someone sat on a board of directors does not mean they should be sued. That goes against our whole criminal justice system. If there is evidence that she was party to problems and helped cover them up, then by all means sue her. But if she knows nothing and did nothing lt her go.
45 posted on
01/12/2002 9:29:00 AM PST by
jf55510
To: Red Jones
"I remember those days and I remember that Phil Gramm did not speak out about that injustice 10 years ago. Wendy Gramm being the wife of a prominent Texas Republican may be protected. It's not fair."
Quit your whining. It is unbecoming in a big business hating commie.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson