Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newgeezer
I read the bill myself. It's full of holes and fake language to make it seem like it can't be used for abortion, but the reality is nothing in this bill will give anyone the slightest pause from taking the money and killing babies with it. For example, nowhere does it define what "abortion" is. Nowhere does it ban chemical abortion, etc., etc. Not that it would make one damn bit of difference even if it did -- since it relies on the USAID director to report violations. (Ha! Ha! Yeah, right.)

You Bushbots are so willing to accept their Potemkin excuses that you're willing to trust the United Nations Population Fund to not do precisely what they've always done. I have no doubt that if this was a Clinton administration effort, you'd be all over this thing. But Bush can do no wrong.

How did you people get so damned gullible overnight?

160 posted on 01/11/2002 10:35:17 AM PST by Aristophanes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Aristophanes
You Bushbots

I'm no Bushbot (I'm a Keyester). I just like to check the source before I go believing everything you antiBushbots pull out of your collective arse.

161 posted on 01/11/2002 10:39:24 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: Aristophanes
I have no doubt that if this was a Clinton administration effort, you'd be all over this thing.

The Clinton administration would have specially targetted the money so it was used for abortions.

163 posted on 01/11/2002 10:40:38 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson