Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: magellan
The "Non-" is a typo.

I wondered about this. Microsoft on Compaq topped the Clustered benchmark, not the Non-Clustered one. You also mentioned that TPM-C is ten years old, which is also pertinent to the discussion because the computing power of the computers has increased dramatically. TPM-C came out in 1991 (1992? about the time the DEC Alpha came out) and some people think it's outdated. Certianly this benchmark will become meaningless at some point, just as statements by Bill Gates that no one will need more than 640KB RAM, or Digital saying 64-bit computing wouldn't catch on.

57 posted on 01/10/2002 8:23:26 PM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Liberal Classic
I wondered about this. Microsoft on Compaq topped the Clustered benchmark, not the Non-Clustered one.

I'm beginning to wonder if you guys can follow links and interpret results. Go to this link:

http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_price_perf_results.asp?resulttype=noncluster

Note the title: Top Ten Non-Clustered TPC-C by Price/Performance
68 posted on 01/11/2002 3:29:36 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson