[markn]

Leave out Suns, spend $2.4 mil more on the Windows box, and don't even test Linux.

And if the benchmark wouldn't have resulted in their marketing-favour (like i believe happened with the SQL Server-Win2k vs. SQL Server-WinNT) they would have suppressed the benchmark and threaten to sue anyone who dares to use it.

[Bush2000]

And if the benchmark wouldn't have resulted in their marketing-favour (like i believe happened with the SQL Server-Win2k vs. SQL Server-WinNT) they would have suppressed the benchmark and threaten to sue anyone who dares to use it.

MS would have sued the TPC? An independent organization with no particular axe to grind? Man, you guys are pathetic. You simply have nothing more to justify the high cost of your solutions.