Yep... As long as the cost is borne by other people's money.
That's when "compassion" is most rewarding.
Posted on 01/09/2002 8:36:45 PM PST by Pokey78
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to many legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.
The White House said that at least 363,000 people — legal immigrants who have not become citizens — would qualify for food stamps under the plan, to be included in the budget President Bush sends Congress in early February. The proposal would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years, the administration said. In October, 18.4 million people were receiving food stamps.
Mr. Bush's plan, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs. Under the proposal, the White House said, noncitizens with low incomes could qualify for food stamps after living here legally for five years. A similar test already applies to legal immigrants seeking Medicaid or cash assistance.
The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made noncitizens ineligible for food stamps and many other types of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, mostly Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged them from working.
Senator Phil Gramm, Republican of Texas, expressed the intent of Congress in 1996 when he said, "Immigrants should come to the U.S. with their sleeves rolled up, ready to work, not with their hands out, ready to go on welfare."
But today, amid a recession that is hurting many immigrants, and with the government waging a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is eager to show his commitment to them. He is also eager to address domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war.
Many of those who could benefit from the food stamp proposal are Hispanic. The White House has been ardently courting Hispanic voters.
In an interview today, Newt Gingrich, the House speaker in 1996, said: "I strongly support the president's initiative. In a law that has reduced welfare by more than 50 percent, this is one of the provisions that went too far. In retrospect, it was wrong. President Bush's instincts are exactly right."
Mr. Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support — as Mr. Clinton often did.
Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups praised the Bush plan. "This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Muñoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."
As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans. Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said last year that capturing a bigger share of the Hispanic vote was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."
But the Republican Party is split, and some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters by espousing a restrictionist immigration policy.
Representative Tom Tancredo, Republican of Colorado, said he would fight the president's food stamp proposal because it would "entice people to come to the United States to be on welfare."
Mr. Tancredo, chairman of the Immigration Reform Caucus, with 55 members in the House, said: "The president has chosen to steal a page out of the Democrats' playbook. The Democrats have been enormously successful in buying votes through welfare. That's all this is, a sop to a Democrat-leaning voter bloc, an attempt to expand our political base by including the Hispanic vote."
Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of immigration laws. Mr. Bush insists he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.
James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said, "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants." He said his group had been supporting a broader restoration of food stamps, as proposed by Senators Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana, and Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa. But Mr. Weill said, "Everybody is moving in the same direction, and we are delighted to see that."
The economy is worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Muñoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."
Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated.
In general, food stamps are available to people with gross incomes up to 30 percent above the poverty level. A three-person household can qualify if its gross income does not exceed $1,585 a month.
Federal officials said Mr. Bush's proposal would make it much easier for state and local employees to determine whether an immigrant was eligible for food stamps. The immigrants are generally ineligible now, but there are some exceptions based on a person's age, work history and date of entry into the United States.
About 800,000 immigrants were removed from food stamp rolls in 1996, according to the Agriculture Department, which runs the program. Two years later, benefits were restored to about 175,000 immigrants, mostly children and older people who were in the country before the legislation was signed in August 1996.
Though I am sure there is a softer side to GW's thinking the hard answer is Votes. He figures most conservatives will vote for him as a lesser of evils. This is where I think he is wrong. For one, he won't get enough new Hispanic votes to offset what he loses from fed up conservatives. Second, he can't out-pander the socialist opposition which will be going for those Hispanic votes…and get em.
Great Point. BTTT
I got a different angle out in the trenches in the city where I live. My latest whine is this, I have three friends:
the first , a female in her late 40's received her SS estimate and is projected to receive $327 per month! She has worked all her life, raising a daughter and refusing child support from her divorced husband
the second, a female in her mid 50's is projected to receive $387 per month!
the third, a male in his late 60's receives $397 per month. He used to be my next door neighbor, and he used to spend the last 2 weeks of every month flat broke---finally friends got him on welfare.
Meanwhile, in the city where I live, these old Russian babushkas and dedushkas get $600+ SSI per month, disability because they can't speak English!---now Bush wants to give them food stamps!
I was a Russian translator in the US Army, so I have spoken with all parties involved.
This is the quote we should be seeing from a 'Conservative' President. Evidentally 'Compassionate'=Get Me A Vote At All Costs
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
Yep... As long as the cost is borne by other people's money.
That's when "compassion" is most rewarding.
bttt
I dunno, anymore. He's riding at 80% in the polls, and he wants to lead us backwards?
Welcome to my the Republican world.
yes , the only way the biggest fish in the pond can get bigger is to get a bigger pond.
Thats why so many political figures from all sides are rushing headlong into globalisim. ... world domination
I don't care if you think it doesn't help. Doing nothing will get you nothing!
LTS
You people are never happy. It doesn't matter what bush does he is a Republican. Just be happy that we have a Republican president and stop worrying about his actions.
And now those of us who are working hard enough to pay our own family grocery bills have to buckle down and work to pay for the immigrants' food, too.
No way will he get enough votes from this to make it worthwhile. Mr. President, you are setting your base afire with this pandering. When America has it rough, let's work on America first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.