Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry Falwell Gay Scandal-Liberty U. on News Lockdown
Nat'l Enquirer ^ | January 9, 2001 | Feature Story-Exclusive

Posted on 01/09/2002 9:27:21 AM PST by umbra

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: umbra
National Enquirer, now there's a really reliable source!!!

I'd say that there's at least a .100 % chance that it's true.

101 posted on 01/09/2002 12:18:01 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Bound to happen, trying to smear our President and it has just begun in earnest. We ain't seen nothing yet.
102 posted on 01/09/2002 12:20:14 PM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
But with David Kendall as counsel, I think that stories against right wing figures have an easier time getting printed .

Funny how we didn't hear about Chelsea's underage drinking in Aspen with her friends a couple of years ago, but Jenna is fair game.

103 posted on 01/09/2002 12:21:15 PM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus
...but by the second day of our calls, the lid of silence had slammed tight.


104 posted on 01/09/2002 12:26:41 PM PST by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
I did not read the article as carefully as I should have. If this is correct, then they are not behaving in a Biblical way. They are in a difficult position and I do not envy them. However, lying is wrong.
105 posted on 01/09/2002 12:33:22 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: umbra
I think the angle here is that Falwell knew something about this guy's battles with homsexuality in the past and still hired him to supervise young men in the Capus Life Office who may have been involved in this sex ring.

And why exactly would he have done that? If he wanted him there, why did he fire him? This makes no sense. What exactly did Falwell or the university do that is even remotely scandelous?

106 posted on 01/09/2002 12:46:04 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lemonhead
Maybe the fundi's on this website will take a couple of hours off from bashing Catholics. (I doubt it)

Why? Are the Catholics jealous that they are losing media air time now or something? What was the point of your question again?

107 posted on 01/09/2002 12:52:25 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Kendall is not their lawyer. The firm Kendall is with has another lawyer within it that reps them.

I doubt Kendall has any say in the stories they print or don't print.

108 posted on 01/09/2002 1:03:33 PM PST by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

Comment #111 Removed by Moderator

To: patent
I'm not a Falwell fan

....and who is

112 posted on 01/09/2002 1:23:52 PM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: umbra
Who cares? The whole world has been turned upside down.
114 posted on 01/09/2002 1:40:09 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoPepper
If the allegations are true, then the administration seriously errored when hiring this individual.

Where are you getting the idea that Falwell knew of this when he hired the guy? If he did know when he hired him, you're right, that would be a scandal. But I read the story and all it shows is that he BECAME aware of a problem. He then fired the guy. That's quite different. You can't impute knowledge he eventually gained to his knowledge at the time of hiring.

115 posted on 01/09/2002 2:46:10 PM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I agree with your sentiments ... unfortunately the exact same statement can be made about the other side of the politcal spectrum.
116 posted on 01/09/2002 7:33:38 PM PST by JPR_Boise_ID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

To: BoPepper
Employers are limited by law as to what aspects of a potential employee's life they can dig into. Are you really suggesting, here on a conservative site, that an employer should make an extensive search, digging around in that potential employee's private sexual life? It would be one thing if there were a police record to be discovered or if he was an out-of-the-closet practicing homosexual, but by all accounts, that was NOT the case. (And BTW, I'm not a fan of Falwell's, but I like to be fair, and I don't see where he did anything wrong.)
118 posted on 01/09/2002 8:05:22 PM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BoPepper
I didn't say it wasn't a scandal. But greater scandal is given by those who APPROVE of sin than by those who disapprove of it. A sex scandal is more JUICY and TITILLATING at a conservative, Christian college than at Sodomy State University, but it's not a greater scandal in objective reality.
119 posted on 01/09/2002 8:53:10 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Noxxus
What's next, posts on FR from Weekly World News?

Would you believe... CNN?


120 posted on 01/09/2002 8:56:06 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson