Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Role in WTC Attack on America is Revealed
PrnNewsWire (via DrudgeReport) ^ | January 8, 2002 | Gordon Thomas

Posted on 01/08/2002 10:09:51 AM PST by OKCSubmariner

TEMPE, Ariz., Jan. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- China will use the current global crisis to launch itself as a new Super-Power and become America's new major enemy, according to Gordon Thomas, an internationally recognized expert on intelligence matters.

On September 11, 2001, the same day the World Trade Center and Pentagon were hit by terrorists, a Chinese Peoples Liberation Army transport aircraft from Beijing landed in Kabul with the most important delegation the ruling Taliban had ever received, says Thomas.

He describes the ongoing threat from China in his new book, "Seeds of Fire: China and the Story Behind the Attack on America" ($25.95, Dandelion Books) available in bookstores, or at http://www.dandelionbooks.com .

"Hours later, CIA Director George Tenet received a coded 'red alert' message from Mossad's Tel Aviv headquarters that presented what he called a 'worst case scenario' -- that China would use a ruthless surrogate, bin-Laden, to attack the United States," says Thomas, who has over thirty years of experience as a foreign affairs reporter and investigative journalist.

The Chinese delegation had come to sign the contract with Afghanistan that Osama bin-Laden had asked for, that would provide the Taliban with missile-tracking, state of the art communications, and air defense systems in exchange for the Taliban's promise to end the attacks by Muslim extremists in China's north-western regions.

"China by 2015 will have deployed tens to several tens of missiles with nuclear warheads targeted against the US," predicts a CIA briefing paper to the Bush Administration, according to Thomas. "Seeds of Fire" devotes over 100 pages of never before published official documents pertaining to China's global take-over strategies.

Thomas also exposes the secret dealings between Russia and China. He reveals reasons for the ever-closer relationship developing between Israel's Mossad and China's Secret Intelligence Service that enabled America's ultra-secret plans to be stolen from Los Alamos.

Thomas is known most recently for his international best-seller, "Gideon's Spies." He has written over 38 best-selling books that have sold over 45 million copies in 36 countries. Dandelion Books has already sold "Seeds of Fire" foreign rights to 30 countries with 2 more pending. Anvil Studios has just acquired the film rights for the book.

"Seeds of Fire" is available at bookstores and at http://www.dandelionbooks.com .


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Jeff Head; joanie-f
A "Breath of Fire" bump for you , my friends.
61 posted on 01/09/2002 8:58:22 AM PST by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
A good evening to you! I'm here listening to Aloha Ronnie and Bob Dornan speak.
62 posted on 01/09/2002 7:49:57 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
The China/Taliban connection goes deeper then we will ever know, or care to admit if we do know. China should be taken out, end of story. Why is it that China or Saudi Arabia have not been warned about their dealings with terroists? I would love to hear GW talk up the Iran talk to either of those countries....never happen though. Why? For the same reasons he won't cut ties with Arafat.
65 posted on 01/11/2002 8:18:57 PM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade; goldilucky; backhoe; Snow Bunny; BeAChooser; OKC Submariner
I" don't envy you at all because I would not want to be defending the Bush administration's record on PNTR for the PRC."

Unfortunately, I have to agree. :(

68 posted on 01/11/2002 8:34:09 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade; OKCSubmariner, Hopalong, all
Communist China would definitely have an interest in giving arms to a force fighting both the US military and Russian-allied proxies in a neighboring country. [China has also helped Iraq and they helped Yugoslavia - why else do you think the US really bombed the Chinese Embassy?] They also know the US would not invade China if the weapons were found, because they know the US govt knows they (China) have nukes and are not afraid to use them.

None of this precludes other side deals with the bin Laden/Taliban crowd to get them to call off the Uyghurs. This isn't very different than the US going substantial aid to the mujahadeen war against the Soviets while US bases in were left largely unmolested as jihadists directed their energies elsewhere.

69 posted on 01/11/2002 10:19:11 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
What do you mean "take out" China?

Although it will never happen I think we should place China on a warning. They were helping the Taliban and they are arming more nuclear missles at us. I am so sick of hearing that China is warning us about this and that and taking our people and planes hostage. Enough is enough. China will one day try to become the superpower and with 25 nukes pointing at the West Coast....well let's just say it won't be pretty.

I am well aware of the ties between GW and SA and I know that SA will always be on the exempt list.

70 posted on 01/12/2002 8:40:04 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Well, before we go on the war path because the PRC is "aiding the Taliban," we'd better start thinking about how the CIA aided Al Qaeda operatives in the Balkans

America has always faced the same problem. We arm our (future) enemies.

73 posted on 01/15/2002 6:14:29 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
I'm not asserting any proof at this point beyond what has been reported re: weapons caches and secret meetings. I'm just pointing out that funding/assisting Islamic forces in order to destabilize other world powers (and incidentally keep them from attacking the funding state for the time being) is nothing new and it would not be remarkable at all if the PRC is lending assistance to Al Qaeda or, for that matter, Abu Sayaff (sp?) in the Phillipines.
74 posted on 01/15/2002 8:24:05 AM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
before we go on the war path because the PRC is "aiding the Taliban,"

And to further clarify, I don't think any of this makes a good case for attacking the PRC. I don't think that would be the brightest of moves.

75 posted on 01/15/2002 8:25:54 AM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
>>Both the US & the PRC built up the Afghan "mujahideen" to get the Russians out of Afghanistan,

Arming "future enemey" is a common practice in politics. All major powers did that sot of things. China armed North Vietnam in Vietnam War and they turned against China with Chinese weapons and supplies right after the war. North Korea could be the same case. The North Korean border guards are very hostile to Chinese tourists. The same thing happened to the Khmer Rouge. Four Chinese soldiers of the UN peacekeeping forces were killed by the Khmer Rouge in 1992 after China stopped supporting them. The USSR supported the CCP in the civil war against the KMT, but Mao turned against them 10 years after liberation.

78 posted on 01/18/2002 8:00:17 PM PST by Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
A) I don't think the people making the decisions are guided by emotions as much as (sometimes twisted) logic.

B) I don't particularly believe what a president implies

C) "They" only release/approve what "proof" they want to.

79 posted on 01/18/2002 10:17:29 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Lake
Mao turned against them 10 years after liberation.

Mao was a liberator?

80 posted on 01/18/2002 10:19:46 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson