When I asked why the vaccine was necessary they said it was to protect the infant if the mother had Hepatitis B. The fact sheet they gave us said risk groups for Hep-B were injection drug users, homosexual men, sexually active heterosexuals, and infants/children of immigrants from disease-endemic areas. Since it is primarily a disease of junkies, gays, and promiscuous heterosexuals, to me, it was a no-brainer. Why expose the infant to anything above zero risk when there was absolutely no chance the mother would have it? They still pressed us but I refused to sign the consent form because there was no rational or logical reason to do so.
A few months later, our pediatrician admitted that the hospitals are under pressure from the CDC for 100% vaccination of newborns. He convinced us that it would be a good idea to have it done before the child was exposed to other children at daycare or school, but he agreed that it was an unnecceary risk for the vast majority of newborns.
I would never give nothing to a newborn child unless I knew what the side effects were.
It amazes me that parents would inject their children with anything.
I personally believe a lot of deaths are caused by these vaccinations.
The government calls it crib death.
Candi
They missed a group: researchers and/or lab clinicians; anyone who routinely handles human tissues or samples of human origin. Since I work with human cells, I've had the vaccine. No big deal.
For some very complicated, non-scaremongering, reasons, I do have certain concerns with vaccines, especially with the wisdom of giving vaccines for diseases like chickenpox, which I don't remember ever hearing is a major killer. But for diseases with severe health consequences, e.g. Hep. B (or A or C), and/or high mortality, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the rare risk of side effects.