Whatever. Trivial word games aside, are there any Vietnam vets who think that we weren't actually at war in Vietnam? And President Bush did receive congressional approval for military action, so let the author put that in his pipe and smoke it.
I guess you missed my posts where I said that I am 100% behind our President and the war. I don't care if it's Ron Paul, Larry McDonald, or the head of the John Birch Society himself. I do not want it on FR. And I do not want a bunch of 40 year old conspiracy crap. Not interested.
Gasp, what a terrible thing for Jim Robinson to say (NOT!!!). The author weakened his argument by posting Jim's words here.
But Jim Robinson isn't interested in these facts. He's spiked threads pointing out that the FBI admitted the IDs used by the hijackers were phony. Jim Robinson has spiked threads about how some of the accused hijackers have turned up alive. Jim Robinson has spiked many of the threads dealing with the Israeli spy scandal and the fact that the US has classified evidence linking some of the arrested Israeli spies with the events of 9/11. Jim Robinson has spiked threads suggestng that Bush has exceeed his constitutional authority. Jim Robinson will tolerate no doubts about the righteousness of Bush's war for oil.
Bush's war for oil? The author is really showing his "objectivity" here after moaning the Jim Robinson doesn't have any. News flash for the author of this tripe: It's Jim's website. He can keep or dump any thread that he wants and he doesn't have to explain it to your dumb ass. Don't like it? Then go away, stay at your website, and quit moaning about how other people run their websites. And comparing America to Nazi Germany ain't helping the argument, either.