[rwfromkansas]

Here we go folks! Jeff wins the prize as the first liberal disrupter to try the slavery line on us. Nice going, Jeff and a great way to avoid the issue by putting in separate issues that do not show any logic.

[Jeff Gordon]

Jeff and a great way to avoid the issue by putting in separate issues that do not show any logic.

Oh my. You sound angry. I can understand why. It is never fun to lose a debate to someone who offers a clear coup de grace argument.

I apologize for defeating you so easily.

[WyldKard]

Here we we go folks! Jeff wins the prize as the first liberal disrupter to try the slavery line on us. Nice going, Jeff and a great way to avoid the issue by putting in separate issues that do not show any logic.

Well, why don't you humor me, and explain exactly why this is an example of seperate issues that "do not show any logic." Not that I'm saying I implicitly agreeing with what Jeff has to say, just that I think you could have come up with a better rebuttal than that. He does make a point, to a certain extent...

FWIW, I used to be of a more "liberal" mindset on the issue, but have recently come around to a far more balanced view on the subject. Just curious as to exactly why Jeff's argument doesn't hold any water, is all...