Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
I didn't comment on this immediately because I think that O'Reilly sometimes bends over backward in his attempt to appear fair and balance.

My gut feeling is that Bush doesn't want to discuss the past, including the Clintons because he knows that the liberal media will immediately take the opportunity to push Clinton to the forefront of the news. The Clintons are basicly irrelavant right now, and I for one, would like to keep them that way.

84 posted on 01/04/2002 12:00:46 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
Ma'am, that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The Clintons are most certainly not irrelevant. They're still very dangerous to our country, particularly if they're left unpunished. Letting them skate so that there will be fewer news reports of them will accomplish what, exactly?

You don't let criminals go to keep their faces off of the TV news. Letting them go allows them to recreate their image and mount another atack on our country once the liberal media has had a chance to gloss over the public perceptions formed toward the end of Clinton's tenure.

Wherever you got this idea, I suggest you examine what you're saying. Maybe your sense of the ridiculous will kick in for you.

94 posted on 01/04/2002 12:46:08 PM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: Eva
The Clintons are basicly irrelavant right now, and I for one, would like to keep them that way.

Not me, I would like to see them in one of GWB's tribunials.

156 posted on 01/05/2002 5:28:15 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson