"That W seems intimidated seems obvious. - The question is why?"
I'm sorry, e-s; when I cannot understand a person's mode of reasoning?
I can't in good conscious ccite their motive, "obvious." Merely not understood; to me.
"He is enjoying historically unparalleled public support..."
Yea; thanks to the towl head SOBs; only.
"...and I am convinced that the public is so radically anti-bureaucrat..."
Again; I [ respectfully ] disagree.
I only use, for example, the bold & shameless behavior(s) of Dashole as proof many are not radically anti-bureaucrat!
"Pro-American" at a time when she's threatened?
Yea, sure.
Don'tcha think it might be somewhat hasty to assume the average 'rat voter's support for Dubya is a statement of an anti-bureaucratic sentiment?
The main Lib pigs don't seem to think so.
Many of these pro-Dubya bozos are nuzzled-up to the public teet in one way or another; just remind 'em of that & watch what happens then, & methinks Dubya's aware of this finickiness.
Surely you remember the Yellow Stone Park vendor quoted here, there, and everywhere during the '95 (?) Thanksgiving budget showdown?? Hmmmm?
There're a lot of those type of people out there who're on the one hand very patriotic in their support of a POTUS during a time like this, and just as spirited in their support of the clymers who protect their place at the nipple.
Add to that, Dubya's got to plan his moves around an incredibly viscious, maniacal Liberal Lamestream media minefield on any & all things the Liberals lay claim to? (enviro-socio-racial et al issues)
Means, you, I, US are (probably) not going to know what the hell's happened with this guy's administration until after the fact?
Hell, look how he's running the war abroad to get a clue how he's got to run the one here at home.
"...that failing to act is a far more likely source of public displeasure."
To us; his base -- his shifting base. A base which is continually being minimized by one side, the other, or both at one time or another; depending what outcome they want?
...anyway; that's how it seems to me.
44 posted on 1/3/02 3:42 PM Pacific by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since you did not respond to my relpy to you on this thread of the other day?
I found a C&P appropriate; since, as far as the Ashcroft JD's concerned?
I see this POTUS having to deal with exactly the same problem: the same infestation within his JD of Liberally-motivated Leftist bureaucrats!!
It must be next to IMPOSSIBLE getting anything accomplished; which, makes working within the JD just as tricky as ALL the other departments noted in the other thread!!
~Perhaps even moreso!
These ignoramous quisling Leftist weasels are permeating our entire infrastructure; regardless what department we're speaking of.
I would like to see Bill O'Riely come up with some documents, people who're willing to talk, anything except his rhetoric & heated commentary [read: editorial] which although reflects MOST of OUR anger & reaal, genuine concerns?
Is just a guy who has a soapbox pissin' & moaning just like the rest of us; and, like many here assuming facts not in evidence, drawing conclusions based upon nothing more than personal cynacism, & smearing people without actually knowing what in the hell's going on.
Geeeeehezz.
The guy's not been in office a friggin' YEAR, yet -- back-off & let this whole thing play-out, for Christ's sake.
...NO, "Dubya Lover" here per se; UNLESS the definition for "lover" is giving him (or anyone else a chance) has come to mean that.
Sorry, I just missed it. (don't always have all day to scan a long list of repetitive pings for the unique ones)
"Don'tcha think it might be somewhat hasty to assume the average 'rat voter's support for Dubya is a statement of an anti-bureaucratic sentiment?"
You've made a leap of logic there. - The statement was based upon my daily experience with my own clients, most of whom express extreme distrust, and revulsion at bureaucrats in general.
Finally, as to giving him a chance, on most issues I am doing just that, but some things are temporally imperative; statutes of limitations are running out, time is the essence.
~Perhaps even moreso!
These ignoramous quisling Leftist weasels are permeating our entire infrastructure; regardless what department we're speaking of.
I am trying to understand what you are saying.
Do you think GW is impotent, and can do nothing about what is going on in his own administration?