[Howlin]

The fact is that people in authority -- people that know more than you do -- people responsible for doing things like investigating -- PEOPLE WHO AREN"T OBSESSIVE ABOUT IT and who aren't on the verge of INSANITY -- have investigated this all and ruled he was NOT murdered. But, of course, they have things to do with their lives other than sit around and play armchair detective.

As for Vince Foster, I'll take Ken Starr's word over yours, if you don't mind. He doesn't seem quite as PARANOID as you do.

[BeAChooser]

The fact is that people in authority -- people that know more than you do -- people responsible for doing things like investigating -- PEOPLE WHO AREN"T OBSESSIVE ABOUT IT and who aren't on the verge of INSANITY -- have investigated this all and ruled he was NOT murdered.

NAME THEM, Howlin. Do you mean Colonel Dickerson? He has already been caught LYING about the evidence and the opinions of his pathologists. Why would you trust him? Do you mean Colonel Gormley ... the pathologist who examined he body. He has already been caught LYING about the evidence and has since admitted that Brown should have had an autopsy. Why would you trust his ORIGINAL conclusion? The FACT is that I can name 6 TOP NOTCH pathologists (several who are MILITARY) who say the hole in Brown's head could be a bullet wound and he should have been autopsied. You can't name ONE ... except a PROVEN LIAR. Go ahead, Howlin, CITE the report(s) that documents your willingness to BELIEVE organizations under the control of Clinton. Explain why this was the first crash without a Air Force Safety Board. Explain the loss of transponder signal when the plane was still 8 miles from the runway. Explain the treatment of the MILITARY pathologists and photographer after they came forward. Tell us why Clinton was LAUGHING as he came out of Brown's funeral after such a TEARFUL eulogy? Stop calling me "INSANE" Howlin and debate the facts. Stop RUNNING. Stop acting like a democRAT. Why are you so afraid of a simple autopsy?

As for Vince Foster, I'll take Ken Starr's word over yours, if you don't mind. He doesn't seem quite as PARANOID as you do.

Then do you also think Bob Barr is PARANOID? He does NOT take Starr's word. And can you tell us why Starr would not respond to Barr's questions about the Foster case? Can you explain ANY of the 101 (so more) questions that have been raised? Can you explain the questions raised by Knowlton at FBI-Coverup.com? Can you tell us why Starr told the public that ALL his investigators agreed with him when O'Reilly says that is absolutely untrue? Can you tell us why Starr allowed the ILLEGAL FBI files to remain in the Whitehouse YEARS after he told the public it was ILLEGAL for the Whitehouse to have them AND THAT THEY'D BEEN RETURNED? Starr was recommended by Clinton, you know. Starr was PART of the coverup. And isn't it curious that Starr just happened to focus everyone's attention on SEX just when the Brown case was heating up?