Replies

If there isn't any positively damning evidence out there... if we're going to get into a another four-year pissing contest with the clintons, the Republicans will pay the price at the polls. I think that's what GWB is thinking about.

So you think Bush is doing the politically WISE thing in not investigating a MOUNTAIN of evidence pointing towards very serious crimes committed by democRATS (many of whom are STILL in positions of power) the last 8 years. Gee ... sounds to me like you think Bush is JUST LIKE THEM! Or are you just RUNNING from the facts like democRATS are prone to do? Any one else want to argue that finding a bullet in Brown's head or evidence that proves that Foster did not die as the government claimed wouldn't be "positively damning"?

Maybe what you allege is true, maybe its all pulp fiction. At any rate, I've made my point and I'm not willing to be engaged in a histrionic discussion over hearsay.

I'm not supporting GWB here, I'm simply offering my opinion as to why his administration isn't engaged in hunting the elusive clintons.

Hi BeAChooser
the last posts I read before I went to bed last night at 2AM were by you
and I woke up this morning wanting to thank you for all your posts
they mean a lot to me
your passion for truth blazes with light
Love, Palo