Secrecy is the only way to win a war. Secrecy prevent loose lips from sinking ships. Yet playing one's hand close to one's chest is strategy, not secrecy.
For instance, Daschle had agreed not to mention Bush's stance on ABM when briefed by the President. The little man nearly tripped over himself to get to a microphone and spill the beans before Putin was afforded an explanation directly from the President. Now, Bush has elected not to share his all of his future plans with our loose lipped congress.
Not revealing one's game plan (call it secrecy if you like), sir, is a must.
To: exodus
Secrecy is the only way to win a war.
Secrecy prevent loose lips from sinking ships.
Yet playing one's hand close
to one's chest is strategy, not secrecy.
Not revealing one's game plan
(call it secrecy if you like), sir, is a must.
# 1407 by Quilla
************************
In a war, yes.
Clinton doesn't qualify as a war.
Clinton is a criminal, and a traitor.
We're not at war,
but let's assume we were.
Whould you allow a known traitor
freedom to act against the country
during time of war?
Clinton has no restrictions on his actions.
He can even leave the country.
Clinton's the worse traitor our nation ever produced,
but Bush allows him the means, freedom, and opportunity
to commit additional acts of betrayal.