The Clinton years numbed and shocked most people so that reiterating their outrages is kinda like saying, that water is wet and that fire is hot. Thus,
"Now Mr. Ashcroft is doing the same thing. There is no reason on this earth why the public should not know the status of the Rich pardon probe. Or the anthrax investigation. And what about Enron, Mr. Attorney General are you going to look into that? Millions of Americans were hosed while some Enron executives made millions.
How about a comment on that, Mr. Ashcroft?"
shouldn't surprise anyone, especially Keyes supporters and those of us who were less than enthusiastic about Bush carrying the flag for the GOP.
All of you? How many of you were there anyway?
Oh, please tell us all how Mr. Keyes would have handled this. We're all dying to know.
It doesn't suprise me at all.
The Clinton crimes are the reason I didn't vote for Bush.
Bush avoided any question about Clinton
or the Justice Department during the campaign.
I pointed that out on this forum,
and was told,
"Bush is a good politician.
He's not saying anything
as a ploy to avoid controversy,
but after he's President,
you'll finally see investigations
into all of the Clinton administration crimes."
I didn't believe that.
I believed that Bush didn't speak out
against the Clinton administration
because he wasn't planning on doing anything
about the crimes.
I was right.
Now, Bush actively protects Clinton,
and he protects the Justice Department, too.
And Dan Burton,
instead of being an enemy of the Clintons,
is now demonized on FreeRepublic
as an enemy of President Bush.