Skip to comments.
Bill O'Reilly blasts Ashcroft and Reno for Corruption
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| January 4, 2002
| Bill O'Reilly
Posted on 01/04/2002 8:52:30 AM PST by editor-surveyor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,441-1,452 next last
To: Letitring
I've contradicted myself in the past. I'll do so again in the future. Quit the nit-picking, that's all.
This is a discussion and opinion site. Read the dialogue and speak your thoughts without being afraid to be corrected.
That's what this website is all about. My opinions aren't carved in granite. I'm all ears.
To: Fred Mertz
Who's "picking nits" Fred? I am asking questions and trying to understand some things. If that BOTHERS you, overlook it.
To: Fred Mertz
"...Listen to palo. She knows the deal."
Hey Fred, Do you mean that she is a DOJ spy ? Now, that would be reason for concern.
603
posted on
01/09/2002 7:01:05 PM PST
by
Darlin'
To: Letitring
Consider it overlooked.
To: Fred Mertz
:)
To: palo verde
"We have an extraordinary man at the helm of our government now -- who is capable of carrying out whatever he wants I don't think he is a phony and if he truly understood clinton, the clinton corruption, and all that took place the way BeAChooser does and that DC Democrats are not Texas Democrats because they have joined clinton's corruption he would share my priorities."
palo, let me get this straight, you and BeAChooser have a better and more thorough understanding of Clinton, his corruption and democrats than the Presidnet of the United States of America has ? Is that what you are saying ? The President with a BS from Yale, an MBA from Harvard, the son of a President, a former Governor of Texas, a former Major League Baseball owner doesn't have the grasp on the situation that you and BeAChooser have ? Is that a fact ?
606
posted on
01/09/2002 7:23:12 PM PST
by
Darlin'
To: palo verde
I would say to you, hold him accountable yes, but at least see what is accomplished after all positions have been filled and he has had an opportunity to replace many of those in positions that are still sympathetic to the Clintons and Democrats. Well my response is NO EXCUSES ...
and to point out that by the time Bush finally gets around to filling all the positions there will probably be nothing left to prosecute because the DOJ will have rolled over on everything important. For example, today in a CIVIL suit LORAL was fined $14 million dollars for their activities in Chinagate ... in exchange for the DOJ agreeing not to pursue them CRIMINALLY. They got off with LESS than a slap on the wrist (remember, the CEO of Loral gave the DNC over half a million in contributions in ONE YEAR) for TREASON. And I see NO INDICATION that ANY of these matters are even being INVESTIGATED. Bush does not have to fill all the positions to INVESTIGATE. As far as I'm concerned, this is just another "move-on" EXCUSE.
To: Darlin'
Hi Darlin'
I'm sorry I flared up at you
I didn't mean it
I hope you can forgive me
Love, Palo
To: LetitRing
Hi LetitRing
I've never criticized Bush about the war and I never will
I have friends whose sons are in it
I trust the honesty of Bush and Cheney and his Cabinet completely
I don't understand this war
but I believe they do and know what they are doing
I pray for the safety of every soldier of ours
Love, Palo
To: palo verde
That's not how it sounded awhile ago. You called it GEORGE'S WAR. I didn't understand that. I'm real glad to hear this, now. Thank you.
To: palo verde
Palo, You weren't taking this personal were you ? Were you being personal ? I thought you thought the point of this thread was political debate. You didn't really think that ? You meant them when you said them to me ? :)
611
posted on
01/09/2002 8:48:55 PM PST
by
Darlin'
To: palo verde
This is not about punishing clinton -- this is about demonstrating that no man is above the Law, and equality before the Law instead this administration is demonstrating there is one law for the rich and powerful, and another for the rest of us Palo .. Sweetie .. as much as I would enjoy Clinton behind bars .. it's not going to happen REGARDLESS who is President .. the people of this country will not put a former president behind bars .. so it's not a matter of the rich and powerful
612
posted on
01/09/2002 10:07:44 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: Mo1
hi sweetie
bingo
you are right
Love, Palo
To: Letitring
Hi LetitRing
the war on Yugoslavia was clinton's war
he did it to aggrandize his ego, and gratify his lust for destruction
this war now is by the USA Government
the whole government
and 90 percent of the population support it
the difference is night and day
and the intentions behind this war are for the good of the country
Love, Palo
To: palo verde
Of course I'm right .. I'm a mom and I'm always right .. lol
615
posted on
01/09/2002 10:45:04 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: BeAChooser
Hi BeAChooser
thank you very much for your post 607
you explained it perfectly -- and I agree with you
Love, Palo
To: Mo1
I love you
To: Darlin'
I love you
To: Darlin'; BeAChooser
Bush was running for Office plus was Governor of Texas
he didn't watch everything 24/7 on tv
and he didn't have the time and energy to give thinking about it his whole life
I devoted my whole life to it
I am giving him an out here -- if he understood it like BeAChooser does
it would be impossible for him not to make the choice BeAChooser is making (and me too)
Bush is not corrupt and he is not weak
what other explanation is there?
Love, Palo
To: Darlin'
If you don't remember me helping get Bush elected -- then you don't remember
It wasn't a group decision to leave TOS
I decided on my own -- the others decided to join me
I chose FR -- because I had watched FR demonstrate in DC during Impeachment
also I lurked on FR
I always had total respect for FR
the last 3 months on TOS were a drag
the solution to every problem by every poster was ''we have to campaign harder to elect more Republicans to Office and contribute more money''
I felt like I was in the Young Republicans club
The reason I joined was to join minds for truth, to save our country from clinton, and also get Bush elected President
I had a glorious experience there when we were all united for this purpose
after Bush became President -- and chose not to bring clinton corruption to Law
I no longer shared purpose with my fellow posters
Love, Palo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,441-1,452 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson