What's wrong with Racicot

TownHall.com ^ | Wednesday, January 2, 2002 | by Robert Novak

[wooly_mammoth]

What quotes? I didn't read those links. Just did a few simple google searches.

[wooly_mammoth]

Check out the link at post 39 and notice that the newest article is 3 years old. But read them and see what you think about what those people are saying.

[wooly_mammoth]

Let's say the baloon got a big 'ol hole ripped in it and if it didn't then I'm afraid that I'll have to read up about this racicot and post what I find as often as I posted links about the Clinton Body Count. I must have posted at least 5000 links and articles about the Clinton Body Count all over the web between 1997-2000.

[horsewhispersc]

Here ya go wooly!..Not sure if it will show up as a link

http://www.csf.colorado.edu/bioregional/2001/msg.00006.html

[Stultis]

I must have posted at least 5000 links and articles about the Clinton Body Count all over the web between 1997-2000.

Oh, great. Maybe you could go and start a thread about the grassy knoll shooter or something and quit spamming this one.

[horsewhispersc]

The article on Ron Brownis an eye opener ;-o

[Lancey Howard]

All this thread needs now is Michael Rivero.

[churchillbuff]

As I've suggested on this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/602267/posts

the conflict of interest is the following: A lobbyist has to ingratiate himself with individual members of congress. The party chairman, in contrast, has to serve the national party's interests as a whole. That might mean steering money to some candidates and not to others - - - but what if some individual members of congress want the money to go elsewhere, even if it's not in the best interest of the party as a whole? If he rejects the congressman's "Suggestion" and goes with the party's interests, his lobbying, and his lobbying clients, could suffer, because he's teed off a congressman. Moreover, if he goes hard in an effort to defeat certain Dems - and they win anyway - then they're his enemies in congress - and his lobbying suffers. So his incentive to go all-out against Dems might be undermined. Bottom line: It doesn't do the GOP much good to have as chairman a guy who must always be concerned not to undermine his lobbying clout with congressmen.