To: duckln
I read the article and am responding to it. You read the article and changed the subject, or shall I say stoled it. Typical of those who can't handle the truth.
Changed the subject? Hardly. I was speaking to Buchanan's lack of qualification for higher office and the level of debate that he's engaging in. That is highly relevant.
Did you know Lanny is a lawyer and Pat is not?
Uuhhhhh, so what?
Did you know Steffy never wrote a book, was syndicated and never ran for any office? He like Kokie and Sam are paid mouthpieces for the neocon leaning media. Come on, get your feet on the ground.
I don't consider being a mouthpiece a qualification for elected office. So where's the inconsistency?
To: Bush2000
I don't consider being a mouthpiece a qualification for elected office. In reality Buchanan has his own strong opinions and thinks for himself. The reason the establishment both republican and democrat abhor Buchanan is because he is the exact opposite of a mouthpiece.
404 posted on
01/02/2002 10:08:40 AM PST by
PuNcH
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson