More like vociferously promoting this massive onslaught.
I hear or read Buchanan and I have to shake my head and ask: 'but 95% of the people in this country actually voted for 'those other guys'? Neither one is qualified to even debate Pat.
Right up until 9-10 Bush was calling for open borders, but instead of blaming these insane free-for-all immigration policies for allowing the trojan horse to get into the United States, in the first place, we jump on the Bush bandwagon to launch an all out war on another country.
I read the posts on this thread and I fear for my country!
Interesting aint it?
Condi Rice Speech 12-Jun-99:
Reflect not on what you have learned but on how you have learned it ... You were not admitted to Stanford for what you had already achieved. You were chosen because of your potential to contribute from here on. [i.e. how we can use you]
This is, I believe, the greatest challenge that we, the human race, faces in the century to come: building multiethnic democracies that work --
We need a more inclusive notion of culture and identity -- one that does not make culture a barrier, where the price of admission is origin and blood. I am one who believes that cultures can be adopted.
To be multicultural is not just to have many cultures represented within an institution -- it is to recognize that individuals can be and often are multicultural themselves. In some sense, multiculturality is at its best when it is within each and every one of us.
We need to find forms of governance that permit people of different races, ethnic backgrounds and creeds to live together and push toward a common goal. I know that the American concept of citizenship is not universally shared. But it does have its advantages. That you can be American not by virtue of blood but by acceptance of a set of values and beliefs is so much the story of this country's success. And it is a model that is spreading -- delinking citizenship and territory and ethnicity. Even in Germany, a country for which the iron link between blood and nation has caused so many woes, universal citizenship is finally coming into being. Often it is pointed out that this is not natural. But I ask you, what is the alternative? If every group must rule itself, there is no end to the chaos that self-determination will bring as borders are drawn and redrawn. --[Citizenship that is based on beliefs means only the politically-correct will have rights]
Are you really committed to living in accordance with all that you say about the value of diversity -- are you just tolerant of them, or are they among your friends?
Remember, this is the President's National Security Advisor. I think we can presume that she sees no threat whatsoever from the millions of Mexicans and other nationalities who are invading our country, and that she is in complete accord with Colin Powell's statement:
Our common border is no longer a line that divides us, but a region that unites our nations, reflecting our common aspirations, values and culture,