Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
I figured you would say that.

"Under the Constitution, Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the states. From 1887-1937, the Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the Commerce Clause and struck down numerous federal laws, such as those regulating the mining and manufacturing industries. Since then, the Court has permitted wide-ranging Congressional legislation, including child labor laws and civil rights statutes prohibiting racial discrimination in places of public accomodations. "

(source)http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/documents/constitution.html

In other words, this only started happening during the reign of everyone's favorite Potentate, Frankin Delano Roosevelt. But I suppose that he is another of your idols, he and his "packed" Supreme Court, huh? But he and the Congress sure did take this country for a fine ride using the commerce clause. Are you SURE you want to keep going there?

598 posted on 12/31/2001 5:40:26 PM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc
Not a single case of the Courts holding that it was "unConstitutional" for the "FedGov to ban substances or objects."

Sorry, you got an F.

Try the extra credit question.

601 posted on 12/31/2001 5:48:21 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson