Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dcwusmc
...the INTERVENTION was so that DEA would NOT HAVE TO COMPLY...

So the "recommendation" is a long dead moot point. Your trump card turned out to be a two of clubs.

597 posted on 12/31/2001 5:13:41 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
Trump fantasies.

Whatta dork.

599 posted on 12/31/2001 5:45:31 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
It's my understanding that the AJL finding/ruling/whatever is still valid and binding but won't be given effect unless the "temporary" injunction obtained by the DEA is lifted. It was DEA that got a restraining order on its own ALJ. And it wasn't MY trump card, in any case.
602 posted on 12/31/2001 5:49:29 PM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
Oh good, Roscoe is back. Still won't tell us if he is a narc. Still won't say if the Framers would like the DEA or think it an abomination. And, oh yeah, thinks federal antihacking laws are not creating thoughtcrime. Roscoe probably imagines himself to be a real conservative, and wonders why he can't get the time of day on the Web's biggest conservative forum.
603 posted on 12/31/2001 5:54:19 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson