To: dcwusmc
...the INTERVENTION was so that DEA would NOT HAVE TO COMPLY... So the "recommendation" is a long dead moot point. Your trump card turned out to be a two of clubs.
597 posted on
12/31/2001 5:13:41 PM PST by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Trump fantasies.
Whatta dork.
599 posted on
12/31/2001 5:45:31 PM PST by
tpaine
To: Roscoe
It's my understanding that the AJL finding/ruling/whatever is still valid and binding but won't be given effect unless the "temporary" injunction obtained by the DEA is lifted. It was DEA that got a restraining order on its own ALJ. And it wasn't MY trump card, in any case.
602 posted on
12/31/2001 5:49:29 PM PST by
dcwusmc
To: Roscoe
Oh good, Roscoe is back. Still won't tell us if he is a narc. Still won't say if the Framers would like the DEA or think it an abomination. And, oh yeah, thinks federal antihacking laws are not creating thoughtcrime. Roscoe probably imagines himself to be a real conservative, and wonders why he can't get the time of day on the Web's biggest conservative forum.
603 posted on
12/31/2001 5:54:19 PM PST by
eno_
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson