Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
No, more like, cannabis is considerably less harmful than beer, but I'd not mind seeing it be sold in places where liquor is sold. Possibly some of the milder, non-addictive hallucinogens too, with suitable warnings/disclaimers.

For everything else, like the "crack and smack" you seem so peculiarly familiar and obsessed with--substances, by the way, that are abused by a smaller percent of the population than there were Harry Browne voters in 2000---could be dispensed by prescription only.

1,942 posted on 01/25/2002 11:02:40 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1932 | View Replies ]


To: MadameAxe
No, more like, cannabis is considerably less harmful than beer, but I'd not mind seeing it be sold in places where liquor is sold.

Libertarian doctrine doesn't allow for distinctions to be drawn between crack and pot.

...could be dispensed by prescription only.

By an unlicensed Doctor Feelgood working the sidewalk?

1,943 posted on 01/25/2002 11:10:10 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1942 | View Replies ]

To: MadameAxe
"crack and smack" ... could be dispensed by prescription only.

That's the same as saying you're in favor of prohibition, Axe. If a person has to get a doctor's prescription for meth or crack cocaine, he or she will just turn to the black market. No doctor is going to prescribe such dangerous substances to a patient, unless you want to outlaw the Hypocratic Oath in order to legalize irresponsibility.

1,944 posted on 01/25/2002 11:10:15 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1942 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson