Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew Sullivan: Spreading the greater lie about Israel
The Sunday Times ^ | December 23, 2001 | Andrew Sullivan

Posted on 12/25/2001 4:08:58 PM PST by CrossCheck

A gaffe is perhaps best described as what happens when a politician accidentally tells the truth. Among professional practitioners of the political arts this doesn’t occur too often. But every now and then the truth emerges. So God bless the French ambassador. All he was saying is what many also privately believe. That “shitty little country”, Israel, has become, among many European elites, the object of hate that dare not speak its name.

I’m not talking merely about editorials that seem to deny the right of Jews to emigrate to Israel; or leaders that come close to blaming Israel itself for the mass murder of its own citizens by Hamas terrorists. It is simply routine at this point to see “balanced” news reports from the BBC and the broadsheet British press that morally equate the actions of Israeli self-defence with the deliberate murder of civilian Jews by Palestinian terrorists.

While Britain and America are allowed to fight a war against terrorism, Israel is urged to practise self-restraint every time another terrorist massacres another group of civilians in a restaurant or disco. Supporting Israel as a matter of right versus wrong is almost unheard of in polite society.

In normal times, this is lamentable but not disastrous. The Jews know something about survival. They can and will defend themselves. But in abnormal times, when anti-semitism is spreading across the globe like a brushfire, it is deeply dangerous. Not since the 1930s has such blithe hatred of Jews gained this much acceptability in world opinion. Across the Arab world, in particular, the past decade or so has seen a shift from mere passive resentment of Jews to a paranoid anti-semitism. That European elites want to ignore it, or — worse — pander to it, suggests we have learnt nothing from history.

Am I exaggerating? I wish I were. The massacre of September 11 has merely exposed and accelerated this trend. In the aftermath, a Gallup poll of Pakistanis found 48% believing that the Jews actually flew the planes into the World Trade Center, after warning their compatriots to stay away. This unhinged lie was routinely reproduced in dozens of Middle Eastern newspapers and remains the biggest single obstacle to getting Arabs and Muslims to acknowledge Osama Bin Laden’s guilt.

Al-Ahram, Egypt’s biggest newspaper and the official mouthpiece of the government, controlled by President Hosni Mubarak, recently published a particular gem as a compilation of the “investigative work of four reporters on Jewish control of the world”. It stated that: “Jews have become the political decision-makers and control the media in most capitals of the world (Washington, Paris, London, Berlin, Athens, Ankara).” It claimed: “The main apparatus for the Jews to control the world is the international Jewish lobby, which works for Israel.”

Or take the official “moderates”. Consider the view of the former imam of New York’s Islamic Cultural Center, a man described until a short time ago as a western-leaning mullah sent to New York to spread inter-faith understanding. After September 11, he disappeared and then popped up in the Middle East with the following statement: “You see these people (the Jews) all the time everywhere, disseminating corruption, heresy, homosexuality, alcoholism and drugs. They do this to impose their hegemony and colonialism on the world. Now, they are riding on the back of the world powers.”

Then there’s the Palestinian Authority newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda: the Muslim-Jewish conflict “resembles the conflict between man and Satan . . . this is the fate of the Muslim nation, and beyond that the fate of all the nations of the world, to be tormented by this nation (the Jews)”. Replace the word Muslim with German and you don’t have an approximation of Hitler. You have Hitler.

Here’s one fact, reported earlier this autumn by Agence France-Presse: Mein Kampf was recently as high as No 6 on the Palestinian bestseller list. Last week, Reuters ran a photograph that was barely picked up elsewhere. It was a picture of Hezbollah youth brigades gathered in a square and all performing the Nazi salute. If that picture had shown American children doing the same, don’t you think it would have been splashed on every front page in the world? In fact, it is a function of condescending racism to the Arabs that we believe this kind of hate-filled pathology is somehow normal for them.

The left is particularly complicit in this evil. Many western liberals chided America for withdrawing from the Durban conference on racism last August. But that conference was the latest high-water mark for Jew-hating. The infamous, fabricated tract, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was widely distributed at the meeting. Questioners were shouted down with cries of “Jew! Jew! Jew!” The Palestinian Authority refuses to include the fact of the Holocaust in its own history books.

What about the following statement by one Ali ’Aqleh ’Ursan: “The covetous, racist, and hated Jew Shylock, who cut the flesh from Antonio’s chest with the knife of hatred, invades you with his money, his modern airplanes, his missiles, and his nuclear bombs.” Is ’Ursan some fringe extremist? No, he’s the chairman of the Arab Writers’ Association.

There are, of course, completely legitimate criticisms of Israel and Israeli policy that have nothing to do with anti-semitism. The settlements policy of the prime minister, Ariel Sharon, is extremely hard to justify. There are Jewish extremists as well; and there is brutality in Israel’s conduct in the West Bank and Gaza that deserves rebuke.

But these valid arguments are light years away from the Jew- hating that has been fomented by Arab governments for years and tolerated by western elites for far too long. Such anti-semitism is the fundamental reason why no peace is possible in the Middle East, because it has so infected every possible Arab interlocutor that Israel simply has nobody to make peace with. In fact, unless western governments expose and condemn such anti-semitism no peace will ever be possible.

And the minute real pressure is put on the Palestinians by the West, we get results. Hamas’s temporary cessation of suicide bombings in Israel last week is directly related to the Bush administration’s clear backing for Israel after the latest terrorist wave. Appeasement is not necessary for peace. In fact, it perpetuates war.

Do we remember anything? Sixty years ago such hatred of Jews — unchallenged, appeased, excused, ignored — led directly to Auschwitz. Its prevalence now in the Middle East should remove any doubt about the morality of Israel’s self-defence in these perilous times and shame anyone who trafficks in it. Yes, this means that Israel’s war against terrorism is the same as our war against terrorism. And, yes, it is good versus evil all over again.

How much more do we need to know about the nature of Israel’s enemies to know whose side we should truly be on?


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: andrewsullivanlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last
To: dennisw
thats idiotic. How am I blaming Israel to say I don't want to die for Israel or see someone I love die for Israel? Same goes for every other place in the world that doesn't rationally impact US interests. I felt the same way about bombing Kosovo.
161 posted on 12/26/2001 6:24:16 AM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
Your way lies madness. How many religious disputes over land might there be in the world? Why should Americans sort out who/which religion has the "right" to that land and then bear the consequences of the other side trying to murder us?

You folks just aren't serious. 19 people with some cause they were willing to die for but which is of absolutely no rational interest to 90% of Americans killed over 3,000 civilians in the US and caused $100 billion of damage. All we can do is retaliate by bombing "terrorist training camps" that are nothing more than desert and a few tires. Where is that going?

162 posted on 12/26/2001 6:37:31 AM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
Blame Islam not the Jews of Israel. Have a good new year.
163 posted on 12/26/2001 6:38:19 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: dlt
It looks like you have some really crappy research skills, if any at all.

I have searched long and hard to figure out how that rumor started, and this is what I have come up with:

Jerusalem Post: "Thousands of Israelis missing near WTC, Pentagon" 9/12/01. Article states: "The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack."

New York Times: "Officials Say Number of Those Still Missing May Be Overstated" 9/22/01. Article states: "There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried." To date, accordingly to the tally, there was 1 Israeli killed in the WTC disaster.

These news articles, along with the famous Odigo message (reported by Ha'aretz and other news media) received by 2 Israelis 2 hours before the attack, and which has not been explained as of this date, has combined, I believe, to contribute to this rumor referred to by Sullivan. And yes, it is circulating vigorously in the Arab world.

Try a google.com search for a number of articles debunking the urban hoax. Snopes.com also debunks this myth.

There's The Lie and the Big Lie. You told both.

164 posted on 12/26/2001 6:49:01 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
And who the heck is blaming the "Jews of Israel?" They're no more and no less to me than their opponents and the same goes for the Hutsis and the Tutsis and everyone else with deep tribal ethnic hatreds of each other that I want no part of and that our government is crazy to risk our lives for. THERE IS NOTHING IN IT FOR US. We have nothing to gain. And it is not for us to judge who God wants to live there, either.
165 posted on 12/26/2001 6:59:05 AM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
And who the heck is blaming the "Jews of Israel?" They're no more and no less to me than their opponents and the same goes for the Hutsis and the Tutsis and everyone else with deep tribal ethnic hatreds of each other that I want no part of and that our government is crazy to risk our lives for. THERE IS NOTHING IN IT FOR US. We have nothing to gain. And it is not for us to judge who God wants to live there, either

Lois, dear, your thought processes are getting a bit addled and you're getting a bit shrill.

Please elaborate on your "And it is not for us to judge who God wants to live there, either." I was unaware that God determined immigration policy. Does the same statement apply to the United States and other countries, or have you just narrowed it down God determining who can live in Israel?

166 posted on 12/26/2001 7:33:06 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
You are nothing but a shrill shill for the Islamics. THey like what you have to say here being that you are Muslim yourself.
167 posted on 12/26/2001 11:10:48 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Now you're just paranoid. What did I say that "shilled" for Muslims? I said they were brutal, too. Both sides are brutal to each other. Thats typical of ethnic tribal hatreds. Its blood feud and NONE OF OUR (US) BUSINESS.
168 posted on 12/26/2001 4:17:39 PM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I was referring to previous posters who felt it was incumbent upon me to be on the Israel side because of my own religion. I don't know of anything in my religion that says that (Catholic).
169 posted on 12/26/2001 4:24:28 PM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
or see someone I love die for Israel?

Who might that be? You posted you just don't care a hoot about the region, and who lives and dies, and when, and in what numbers. I just you will continue to say that (I just don't give a damn) if Israel gets in trouble at some point without US support, and in order to avoid going down nukes just about everyone in the area into oblivion, and in the course of that, maybe some nukes get sent out way by somebody.

Btw, just what "tribes" do you give a damn about?

170 posted on 12/26/2001 4:32:21 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Torie
If you're saying we have to maintain a foreign policy out of fear that Israel will unleash nuclear weapons and kill millions in that area and hundreds of thousands of Americans from cancer via the radiation cloud, how is that different than appeasing bin Laden? Americans don't have the right to act in their own interest because we have to fear a descent into nuclear madness from Israel? Thats a new one.
171 posted on 12/26/2001 6:27:39 PM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
America acting to avoid the nukes flying is in its interests, at least to me. That is real politik. I also don't like genocide, mass slaughter, and forced diasporas, but that is a cultural and moral taste of mine. Yours may differ.
172 posted on 12/26/2001 6:31:18 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
Oh yes, the best way to avoid nukes via Bin Laden is to kill him, his cohorts, and destroy the stuff. We seem to be making some progress on that score. Scratch him from he might get nukes and it worries us club. Others may follow. Stay tuned.
173 posted on 12/26/2001 6:33:48 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: SeferKoheleth
If by "against the occupation" you mean returning to the pre-1967 Auschwitz borders with NO guarantee of peace, sacrificing Israeli security by giving Arafat guns and ignoring Hamas suicide bombings for fear of using any violence whatsoever, then I'd place the % a little lower, say about 2-3%-- basically the HaAretz staff and a few dazed out secular Tel Aviv yuppies.

Strong language when your position is the one similar to the Nazi position in 38-39. And, no, your figures are way off. Anywhere from 20-40% of non-arab Israelis are against the occupation non-withstanding your stalinesque spin on the situation.

174 posted on 12/29/2001 12:07:03 AM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

Comment #175 Removed by Moderator

To: SeferKoheleth
Excellent post....... you throwing pearls before swine.
176 posted on 12/30/2001 7:58:58 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson