Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobFromGa
I defer to you on Barnes.

Who else is down South? Siegelman? Jim Hunt(How old is he)? Musgrove? I'd go with Mark Warner, but he's too much of a political newbie. I can see Warner going for it in 2008.

I keep remembering that King Clinton was supposed to be a loser as well.

As for Hillary, I do not see it at all. No blue collar appeal whatsoever.

77 posted on 12/23/2001 6:51:38 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan
Who else is down South?

Siegelman (Gov-D-AL) has to run for re-election in 2002. He could get beat by the right candidate-- AL was 56-42 Bush in 2000 and 50-43 Dole in 1996. He is out as Pres candidate and might lose Gov. as well.

I am not saying you are wrong that Barnes might be the Dem Prez nominee in 2004 when all said and done. BUT if so, it will be as the sacrificial lamb. Plus, he's got to run for Governor again in 2004 and might not be able to handle both duties. Do the DEMs want to give up GA governorship?

81 posted on 12/23/2001 7:10:36 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson