[garbanzo]

No he has no right to take others with him or to harm other people. (And I have no idea what neural circuits allow you to make an analogy between murder and consentual sex - I suspect it's mainly the fact that you can't think for yourself - and can only follow rules others make for you).

[Cultural Jihad]

You: "If we have no future, I don't see the reason why we should act as if we should."

Me: "So let the boy murder a 7-11 clerk for some bubble gum, eh, since he's immune to the death penalty?"

You: "No he has no right to take others with him or to harm other people. ... I have no idea what neural circuits allow you to make an analogy between murder and [consensual] sex ..."

But would you rob him of his own free will choice to do as he pleases, since he is on his death bed? It was you who set up the criteria. Don't blame me when you don't like the logical extension of your own argument or the unintended consequences of your own ideology.