To: miniver-cheevey
So you would recommend I take my 11 year old son? He has not read the books -- his older brother has and is, of course, dying to LOTR. I would appreciate your comments because I keep hearing of the violence in the movie.
23 posted on
12/21/2001 3:29:05 PM PST by
wyopa
To: wyopa
This is violence worth seeing, IMO.
The funny thing is, the first book of the trilogy was the least violent of the three, as I recall from my readings 35 years ago.
There is an epic reason for the violence in the trilogy, a reason which an eleven-year-old ought to go ahead and understand. The violence is necessary to support the theme that the bad guys in LOTR are very, very bad guys. And they don't win.
24 posted on
12/21/2001 3:42:30 PM PST by
the_doc
To: wyopa
The violence didn't bother my 11 yo., there really isn't any blood & guts type scenes & maybe because it is fantasy. What scared him was when Bilbo turned ugly & when the cave troll jumped out. I would suggest you watch it first & then decide if you should take him.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson