Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Of course it would have been prohibitive since the infrastructure for such an industry did not exist and there is no evidence that anyone down south wanted to foster one. You can complain about economic bondage to the North but with all the agricultural wealth that the south produced they short-sightedly decided to sink it back into plantation agriculture rather than diversify. Your problems were of your own making.
342 posted on 12/20/2001 12:56:42 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
NS, I'm not disagreeing with you, I think it was short-sighted of the South not to have some ships, if for nothing else to keep the North honest. I'd have to research it myself to see if the federal governement actually had any kind of protectionist policies regarding shipping, but I do think it suspicious that that South had very few ships. But I do agree, with the money the South made they could have built/puchased a fleet.
348 posted on 12/20/2001 1:16:14 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson