Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
And why should the fact that SC state trops fired on her -not- constitute the start of the war?

If bouncing a few pellets off the side of your little (figurative) tugboat constitutes war, then the fact that the star of the west was secretly delivering 200 armed infantry and ammunition to Sumter could similarly be characterized as an act of war - moving a hostile organized military force onto land that does not belong to them for the purpose of occupying that land and defending it as their position with military force.

Then your answer is yes. Good deal.

No, the war generally is thought to have begun with the firing on Fort Sumter.

How did we get off on this? I forget.

Too, the land did clearly belong to the federal government because SC ceded it to the feds in an 1836 act of the legislature. You have just as much right to sieze your neighbors house as SC did to sieze the fort.

Walt

294 posted on 12/20/2001 4:38:53 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
No, the war generally is thought to have begun with the firing on Fort Sumter.

Do I take it that now you are changing your position, considering that you stated earlier that the war started the previous december?

How did we get off on this? I forget.

You stated the war began in december, contradicting what you stated above.

358 posted on 12/20/2001 7:49:40 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson