Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Why the rush to stock the fort, if not to start the war?

Because Lincoln's clearly stated policy was to maintain federal property without causing friction. The fort had -been- stocked before; restocking it was not an act of war. Firing on Old Glory was and is.

Walt

225 posted on 12/19/2001 4:31:06 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Restocking was an act of war. Read my reply to NS previously (#202). I'll tell you why Lincoln was in a hurry:
The South has furnished near three-fourths of the entire exports of the country. Last year she furnished seventy-two percent of the whole ... we have a tariff that protects our manufacturers from thirty to fifty percent, and enables us to consume large quantities of Southern cotton, and to compete in our whole home market with the skilled labor of Europe. This operates to compel the South to pay an indirect bounty to our skilled labor, of millions annually.
Daily Chicago Times, 10 Dec 1860
That either revenue from duties must be collected in the ports of the rebel states, or the ports must be closed to importations from abroad ... If neither of these things be done, our revenue laws are substantially repealed; the sources which supply our treasury will be dried up; we shall have no money to carry on the government; the nation will become bankrupt before the next crop of corn is ripe
New York Evening Post, 12 Mar 1861
That's why Lincoln rushed to restock. And so much for Llan's assertion that the South leached off the North - It was the other way around.
233 posted on 12/19/2001 8:47:18 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson