OK fair enough. But you are a corporeal example of why an uninformed sterile layperson's armchair application of constitutional law is a total dead end. I also think you are being disingenuous, because your alienation from the application of force here goes far beyond constitutional niceties. But each can judge that for themselves.
But you are a corporeal example of why an uninformed sterile layperson's armchair application of constitutional law is a total dead end. Of course it's a dead end. A dead end for tyrants. If they had to abide by the constitution then 100% of the military actions we've taken in the last 50 years would be forbidden.
The restrictions are there for a reason. If you take the political risk of declaring war and executing that war, then you should accept responsibility for your actions.
Subverting the consitution is wrong and there is no justification for it.