Skip to comments.
Aids 'bigger threat than terrorism' (Says clinton)
Guardian/UK ^
| 12/14/01
| Sarah Boseley
Posted on 12/14/2001 4:03:44 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
1
posted on
12/14/2001 4:03:44 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
God how I hate him.
2
posted on
12/14/2001 4:15:15 AM PST
by
speedy
To: kattracks
He needs to move his ass and library over there where they lap up his bull S***.
3
posted on
12/14/2001 4:18:30 AM PST
by
boomop1
To: kattracks
Setting a new standard as the worst ex-President ever.
To: kattracks
the implications of what this idiot said is incredibly stupid. first, people with less than a year left in their life will turn violent because of aid -- absurd. their violence will cause and end to democracy in some countries -- absurd. and the implication is that the overthrow of these government will create safe havens for terrorists -- outlandish.
clinton must have some inside information that is causing him to be so concerned with aids. could it be that he is infected and does not have his sexual controls in gear?
5
posted on
12/14/2001 4:24:47 AM PST
by
mlocher
To: kattracks
He should really move his ears so he can wipe his anus.
6
posted on
12/14/2001 4:26:54 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
To: kattracks
None of this makes sense. It's like the wild rantings of a madman. I can't believe that people pay to hear this garbage.
To: speedy
God how I hate him.
Come on now. He's going to need the queer and deviant vote when he runs for king of the world. You should know that by now.
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
Forty million people worldwide now with AIDS, in four years, it will be 100 million. This is such a bunch of horse manure. The reason that the death rates fell in Brasil, is because people that were sick, were given treatment. That is the way of anti-biotics, and anti-virals, they make people better. Look at the definition of AIDS, and you can see the same diseases that bedevil those without a HIV+ test. In other words, a person with Pneumonia and HIV+ test is diagnosed as AIDS, the person in the next cubicle with Pneumonia with a HIV- test has Pneumonia. A simple accounting difference, and how many in Africa that are called AIDS cases, have even had a HIV test? The answer is they don't give them very often, it costs too much, so they just categorize them as AIDS and ask Uncle Sugar(USA) for more money
10
posted on
12/14/2001 4:42:53 AM PST
by
jeremiah
To: kattracks
As long as I can still keep a 150 pound flamer from flying into my backside, I'll consider the Osamas of the world the bigger threat (despite the learned opinions of a man who surely knows his STD's.)
Ed
To: kattracks
The number is projected to rise to 100m by 2005 Why don't they start living a clean lifestyle? (For all the knee jerk reactions I do realize some people get it by transfusion, etc. but clean living is the beginning)
To: kattracks
I would STILL like to see his medical records.
To: kattracks
Clinton urges the west to spend more on prevention and research We could begin by moving Clinton to Antartica, so he can't find more girls to deflower/ infect.
To: kattracks
Why spend billions and billions on education and prevention when the cause of the plague is obvious: people all around the world want to have sex with people they aren't married to. I know I risk stating the obvious, and sounding like the fool, but think about it: if the world kept sex inside marriage, AIDS, STD's, abortions, and out-of-wedlock births would fade away.
Just because it's difficult, doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. The benefits are too great, and the costs of not doing so are too high.
15
posted on
12/14/2001 4:54:50 AM PST
by
kezekiel
To: edskid
As long as I can still keep a 150 pound flamer from flying into my backsideNice image for so early in the morning. I'll be chuckling all day.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I think he has AIDS dementia. He really is sounding insane. I wonder if he is one of the ones who has only a year left to live.
17
posted on
12/14/2001 4:58:57 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: kattracks
Like Arafat, this creep is irrelevant.
To: kattracks
"This is not rocket science. It is about money ..." Yes Bill, it is about money and I am sure that some big antiviral drug company is sponsoring your former royalness to make idiotic speeches like this one. Follow the money and the girls and you always find Bill Clinton.
To: NC Conservative
Exactly. Want to stop AIDS? Quit butt-slamming your buddy and don't use drugs. It'll die out.
Hell, just don't have sex outside of marriage. But we can't teach that because it has religios moral implications. Fine. Keep dying.
20
posted on
12/14/2001 5:04:43 AM PST
by
GreatOne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson